Kingdom (biology)
From Free net encyclopedia
In biology, a kingdom or regnum is the top-level, or nearly the top-level, taxon of organisms in scientific classification.
In his Systema Naturae, first published in 1735, Carolus Linnaeus distinguished two kingdoms of living things: Animalia for animals and Vegetabilia for plants (Linnaeus also treated minerals, placing them in a third kingdom, Mineralia). Linnaeus divided each kingdom into classes, later grouped into phyla for animals and divisions for plants.
When single-celled organisms were first discovered, they were split between the two kingdoms: mobile forms in the animal phylum Protozoa, and colored algae and bacteria in the plant division Thallophyta or Protophyta. However, a number of forms were placed in both - for instance the mobile alga Euglena, and the amoeba-like slime moulds. As a result, Ernst Haeckel suggested creating a third kingdom Protista for them, although this was not very popular until relatively recently (sometimes as the Protoctista) <ref name="Haeckel">Template:Cite book</ref><ref name="Scamardella">Template:Cite journal</ref>.
Contents |
Two empires, four kingdoms
The discovery that bacteria have a radically different cell structure from other organisms — they lack a nucleus — led Chatton to propose a division of life into two empires: organisms with a nucleus in Eukaryota and organisms without in Prokaryota.<ref name="Chatton">Template:Cite book</ref>
Chatton's proposal was not taken up immediately; a more typical system was that of Herbert Copeland, who gave the prokaryotes a separate kingdom, originally called Mychota but later referred to as Monera or Bacteria <ref name="Copeland1938">Template:Cite journal</ref>. Copeland's four-kingdom system placed all eukaryotes other than animals and plants in the kingdom Protoctista <ref name="Copeland1956">Template:Cite book</ref>.
It gradually became apparent how important the prokaryote/eukaryote distinction is, and Stanier and van Niel popularized Chatton's two-empire system in the 1960s <ref name="Stanier">Template:Cite journal</ref>.
Five kingdoms
Robert Whittaker recognized an additional kingdom for the Fungi. The resulting five-kingdom system, proposed in 1969, has become a popular standard and with some refinement is still used in many works, or forms the basis for newer multi-kingdom systems. It is based mainly on differences in nutrition: his Plantae were mostly multicellular autotrophs, his Animalia multicellular heterotrophs, and his Fungi multicellular saprotrophs. The remaining two kingdoms, Protista and Monera, included unicellular and simple cellular colonies <ref name="Whittaker1969">Template:Cite journal</ref>.
Six kingdoms
In the years around 1980 there was an emphasis on phylogeny and redefining the kingdoms to be monophyletic. The Animalia, Plantae, and Fungi were generally reduced to core groups of closely related forms, and the others thrown into the Protista. Based on rRNA studies Carl Woese divided the prokaryotes into two kingdoms, called Eubacteria and Archaebacteria. Such six-kingdom systems have become standard in many works <ref name="Woese1977">Template:Cite journal</ref>.
A variety of new eukaryotic kingdoms were also proposed, but most were quickly invalidated, ranked down to phyla or classes, or abandoned. The only one which is still in common use is the kingdom Chromista proposed by Cavalier-Smith, including organisms such as kelp, diatoms, and water moulds. Thus the eukaryotes are divided into three primarily heterotrophic groups, the Animalia, Fungi, and Protozoa, and two primarily photosynthetic groups, the Plantae (including red algae) and Chromista. However, it has not become widely used because of uncertainty over the monophyly of the latter two kingdoms.
Three domains
In 1990, Carl Woese proposed that the Eubacteria, Archaebacteria, and Eukaryota represent three primary lines of descent and accordingly he promoted them to domains, naming them Bacteria, Archaea, and Eucarya <ref name="Woese1990">Template:Cite journal</ref>. This three-domain system has received notable criticism but has generally displaced the older two-empire system as a way of organizing kingdoms together <ref name="Mayr">Template:Cite journal</ref>.
Summary
| Linnaeus 1735 2 kingdoms | Haeckel 1866<ref name="Haeckel"/> 3 kingdoms | Chatton 1937<ref name="Chatton"/> 2 empires | Copeland 1956<ref name="Copeland1956"/> 4 kingdoms | Whittaker 1969<ref name="Whittaker1969"/> 5 kingdoms | Woese et al. 1977<ref name="Woese1977"/> 6 kingdoms | Woese et al. 1990<ref name="Woese1990"/> 3 domains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (not treated) | Protista | Prokaryota | Monera | Monera | Eubacteria | Bacteria |
| Archaebacteria | Archaea | |||||
| Eukaryota | Protoctista | Protista | Protista | Eukarya | ||
| Vegetabilia | Plantae | Fungi | Fungi | |||
| Plantae | Plantae | Plantae | ||||
| Animalia | Animalia | Animalia | Animalia | Animalia |
(Note that the equivalences in this table are not perfect. For example, Haeckel placed the red algae (Haeckel's Florideae; modern Florideophyceae) and blue-green algae (Haeckel's Archephyta; modern Cyanobacteria) in his Plantae, but in modern classifications they are considered protists and bacteria respectively. However, despite this and other failures of equivalence, the table gives a useful simplification.)
References
<references/>de:Reich (Biologie) es:Reino (biología) fr:Règne id:Kerajaan (biologi) it:Regno (biologia) ja:界_(生物学) ko:계 (생물) lt:karalystė nl:Rijk (biologie) pl:Królestwo (biologia) pt:Reino (biologia) ru:Царство (биология) sl:kraljestvo (biologija) sv:Rike (biologi) th:อาณาจักร (ชีววิทยา) tl:Kingdom (biyolohiya) tr:Alem (Biyoloji)