Microsoft product activation debate
From Free net encyclopedia
Cynical (Talk | contribs)
clean up using [[Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser|AWB]]
Next diff →
Current revision
Template:Unreferenced Microsoft's product activation system, first introduced on Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and Microsoft Office, has become the subject of much debate. It was the first widespread use of a product activation system, and Microsoft started to take control over the computer in a way that makes many users feel uncomfortable. Microsoft checks the system every now and then without asking or showing this to the user. Because of heavy encryption, the user cannot check what data is being sent.
Critics complain that the product activation is inconvenient. Users must reactivate their product if they change hardware or reinstall the operating system, and if the product is activated too many times, the user must contact Microsoft by telephone to reactivate the product. Activation over the telephone is a time-consuming process, involving the entry of a 48 digits Confirmation ID.
Proponents claim that product activation is handled in a professional manner. Microsoft does not require the user to register their product to activate, nor do they require any personally identifiable information. Because of the nature of the activation system, Microsoft cannot even determine the unique serial numbers in your computer from the Installation ID. Moreover, Microsoft has handled their call center well; most users report hold times of less than five minutes.
Activation still remains controversial. It can often be a hindrance or inconvenience to those who do a lot of changes of their hardware regularly (such as hardware reviewers). Moreover, if the user has to reinstall their operating system, they will often be forced to call Microsoft to reactivate.
It is also controversial for the operating system to have product activation. If Windows XP's product activation stops the process of loading Windows, then the user cannot use any of the other software either, even that which is nothing to do with Microsoft or their copyrights, because it is an OS that applications run on.
Microsoft introduced this scheme in order to prevent copyright infringement, and what Microsoft terms "casual copying", where a purchaser of a product gives a friend a copy of the CD or where the purchaser installs the software on multiple computers (which normally requires multiple licenses).
Activation, however, has done little to curb casual copying. Many casual copiers have simply resorted to using activation cracks, which circumvent the activation system. In addition, there is a Volume License version of Windows XP Professional which requires no activation whatsoever; this edition has become extremely popular among people who don’t wish to use product activation, including people using unlicensed copies of the program. Those who have been truly hurt are those who unknowingly buy cracked copies of Windows from retailers, or have it installed for them by unscrupulous repairers.