Absolute monarchy
From Free net encyclopedia
Absolute monarchy is a monarchical form of government where the ruler has the power to rule his or her land or country and its citizens freely, with no laws or legally-organized direct opposition in force. Although some religious authority may be able to discourage the monarch from some acts and the sovereign is expected to act according to custom, in an absolute monarchy there is no constitution or body of law above what is decreed by the sovereign (king or queen). As a theory of civics, absolute monarchy puts total trust in well-bred and well-trained monarchs raised for the role from birth.
In theory, an absolute monarch has total power over his or her people and land, including the aristocracy and sometimes the clergy (see caesaropapism), but in practice, absolute monarchs have often found their power limited. One current example is the Kingdom of Nepal, which is technically an absolute monarchy, but which faces stiff opposition from Maoist insurgents.
Some monarchies have powerless or symbolic parliaments and other governmental bodies that the monarch can alter or dissolve at will. Despite effectively being absolute monarchies, they are technically constitutional monarchies due to the existence of a constitution and national canon of law.
Contents |
Modern examples
The remaining states that are technical absolute monarchies in the modern world are Saudi Arabia, Brunei, Nepal and Swaziland. One might also add that the Vatican City state, headed by an elected monarch who has absolute power, is also an absolute monarchy.
In Jordan and Tonga, the monarch, although not absolute, retains considerable power. The King of Bhutan, Jigme Singye Wangchuk, has voluntarily announced reforms which would usher in a two-party democracy by 2008. It is not clear how much power King Wangchuk or his successor Prince Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck would retain in the new system. In Nepal, King Gyanendra dismissed Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba due to the ongoing conflict with the Maoists, and formed his own cabinet [1], but claims democracy will return in 3 years. In Liechtenstein, nearly two-thirds of the tiny principality's electorate have agreed to give Prince Hans Adam veto power he asked for. Although this does not make Hans Adam an absolute monarch, it makes him closer to being an absolute monarch than almost all other royals in Europe.
Many of the nations in the Middle East, such as Qatar and Kuwait, are said to be absolute monarchies, as their monarchs continue to hold great power under their respective constitutions. However, in these cases there are also parliaments and other bodies that advise and have the power to curtail the monarch.
Theories and History
The theory of absolute monarchy developed in the late Middle Ages from feudalism during which monarchs were still very much first among equals among the nobility. With the creation of centralized administrations and standing armies backed by expensive artillery, the power of the monarch gradually increased relative to the nobles, and from this was created the theory of absolute monarchy.
Divine Rights
Early Absolutists advocated the theory of Divine Right of Kings to justify their position. In the 16th century, monarchs took advantage of the clergy's weakness during the Reformation to impose their will. They declared to have the ability to decide the religion of their subjects. Henry VIII of England seized the property of the Catholic church while France claimed "Gallican liberties". These new monarchs claimed to be responsible solely to God. They attempted to eliminate or marginalize customs, institutions, and laws that held their predecessors in check.
Thomas Hobbes
Hobbes believed that all the people should invest their power and rights in one sovereign ruler. He also argued the ruler has the ability to decree anything for the sake of the people. People may not argue with the ruler's rulings.
Enlightened Despotism
During the Enlightenment, the theory of absolute monarchy was supported by the French philosophes as a form of enlightened despotism. The philosophes argued that only an enlightened monarch can introduce progressive reforms to curtail feudalism and reactionary clergy. However, it must be pointed out that while Louis XV and Louis XVI were absolute monarchs in theory, they had to contend with many private interests, some of which opposed reforms, such as the great nobility and the parlements. Enlightened despotism was discredited with the fall of Napoleon.
The popularity of the notion of absolute monarchy declined substantially after the French Revolution and American Revolution, which promoted theories of government based on popular sovereignty.
Historical Examples
One of the best-known historical examples of an absolute monarch was Louis XIV of France. His famous statement, L'état, c'est moi (The state is me), summarises the fundamental principle of absolute monarchy (sovereignty being vested in one individual). Although often criticised for his extravagance (his great legacy is the huge Palace of Versailles), he reigned over France for a long period, and some historians consider him a successful absolute monarch.
Until 1905, the Tsars of Russia also governed as absolute monarchs. Peter the Great reduced the power of the nobility and strengthened the central power of the Tsar, establishing a bureaucracy and a police state. This tradition of absolutism was built on by Catherine the Great and other later Tsars. Although Alexander II made some reforms and established an independent judicial system, Russia did not have a representative assembly or a constitution until the 1905 Revolution.
Throughout much of history, the Divine Right of Kings was the theological justification for absolute monarchy. Many European kings, such as the Tsars of Russia, claimed that they held supreme autocratic power by divine right, and that their subjects had no right to limit their power. James I and Charles I of England tried to import this principle into England; Charles I's attempts at establishing absolutist government along European lines was a major cause of the English Civil War. By the 19th century, the Divine Right was regarded as an obsolete theory in most countries, except in Russia where it was still given credence as the official justification for the Tsar's power.
See also
- political absolutism
- absolute power
- constitutional monarchy
- Totalitarianism
- dictatorship
- fascism
- Thomas Hobbes
- Democracyca:Monarquia absoluta
eo:Absoluta monarkio es:Monarquía absoluta ko:전제 군주제 id:Monarki mutlak is:Einveldi lt:Absoliutinė monarchija ms:Monarki mutlak nl:Absolute monarchie ja:絶対君主制 nn:Einevelde pl:Monarchia absolutna pt:Monarquia absoluta ru:Абсолютная монархия uk:Абсолютизм th:ระบอบสมบูรณาญาสิทธิราชย์