Drag coefficient
From Free net encyclopedia
The drag coefficient (Cd or Cx) is a number that describes a characteristic amount of aerodynamic drag caused by fluid flow, used in the drag equation. Two objects of the same frontal area moving at the same speed through a fluid will experience a drag force proportional to their Cd numbers. Coefficients for rough unstreamlined objects can be 1 or more, for smooth object much less.
A Cd equal to 1 would be obtained in a case where all of the fluid approaching the object is brought to rest, building up stagnation pressure over the whole front surface. The top figure shows a flat plate with the fluid coming from the right and stopping at the plate. The graph to the left of it shows equal pressure across the surface. In a real flat plate the fluid must turn around the sides, and full stagnation pressure is found only at the center, dropping off toward the edges as in the lower figure and graph. The Cd of a real flat plate would be less than 1, except that there will be a negative pressure (relative to ambient) on the back surface. The overall Cd of a real square flat plate is often given as 1.17. Flow patterns and therefore Cd for some shapes can change with the Reynolds number and the roughness of the surfaces.
Contents |
Cd in automobiles
The drag coefficient is a common metric in automobile design, where designers strive to achieve a low coefficient. Minimizing drag is done to improve fuel efficiency at highway speeds, where aerodynamic effects represent a substantial fraction of the energy needed to keep the car moving. Indeed, aerodynamic drag increases with the square of speed. Aerodynamics are also of increasing concern to truck designers, where a lower drag coefficient translates directly into lower fuel costs.
About 60% of the power required to cruise at highway speeds is taken up overcoming air drag, and this increases very quickly at high speed. Therefore, a vehicle with substantially better aerodynamics will be much more fuel efficient.
CdA
While designers pay attention to the overall shape of the automobile, they also bear in mind that reducing the frontal area of the shape helps reduce the drag. The combination of drag coefficient and area is CdA (or CxA), a multiplication of the Cd value by the area.
The product of the drag coefficient and area, called drag area, was introduced in 2003 by Car and Driver as a more accurate way to compare the aerodynamic efficiency of various automobiles. Average full-size passenger cars have a drag area of roughly 8.5 ft² (.79 m²). Reported drag area ranges from the 2005 Chevrolet Corvette at 6.1 ft² (.57 m²) to the 2006 Hummer H3 at 16.8 ft² (1.56 m²).
More examples: from <http://www.mayfco.com/tbls.htm>
- 5.10 - 1999 Honda Insight
- 5.71 - 1990 Honda CR-X Si
- 5.76 - 1968 Toyota 2000GT
- 5.88 - 1990 Nissan 240SX
- 5.92 - 1994 Porsche 911 Speedster
- 6.27 - 1986 Porsche 911 Carrera
- 6.27 - 1992 Chevy Corvette
- 6.54 - 1991 Saturn Sports Coupe
- 6.57 - 1985 Chevy Corvette
- 6.77 - 1995 BMW M3
- 6.79 - 1993 Toyota Corolla DX
- 6.81 - 1991 Subaru Legacy
- 6.90 - 1993 Saturn Wagon
- 6.96 - 1988 Porsche 944 S
- 6.96 - 1995 Chevy Lumina LS
- 7.02 - 1992 BMW 325I
- 7.04 - 1991 Honda Civic EX
- 7.10 - 1995 Saab 900
- 7.14 - 1995 Subaru Legacy L
- 7.34 - 2001 Honda Civic
- 7.39 - 1994 Honda Accord EX
- 7.48 - 1993 Camaro Z28
- 7.57 - 1992 Toyota Camry
- 7.69 - 1994 Chrysler LHS
- 7.72 - 1993 Subaru Impreza
- 8.70 - 1990 Volvo 740 Turbo
- 8.71 - 1991 Buick LeSabre Limited
- 9.54 - 1992 Chevy Caprice Wagon
- 10.7 - 1992 Chevy Blazer
- 16.8 - 2006 Hummer H3
- 26.3 - Hummer H2 (like driving 3 cars at once)
Drag in sports and racing cars
Reducing drag is also a factor in sports car design, where fuel efficiency is less of a factor, but where low drag helps a car achieve a high top speed. However, there are other important aspects of aerodynamics that affect cars designed for high speed, including racing cars. Notably, it is important to minimize lift, hence increasing downforce, to avoid the car ever becoming airborne. Also it is important to maximize aerodynamic stability: some racing cars have tested well at particular "attack angles", yet performed catastrophically, i.e. flipping over, when hitting a bump or experiencing turbulence from other vehicles (most notably the Mercedes-Benz CLR). For best cornering and racing performance, as required in Formula 1 cars, downforce and stability are crucial and these cars have very high Cd values.
Typical values and examples
The typical modern automobile achieves a drag coefficient of between 0.30 and 0.35. SUVs, with their flatter shapes, typically achieve a Cd of 0.35–0.45. Notably, certain cars can achieve figures of 0.25-0.30, although sometimes designers deliberately increase drag, in favour of reducing lift.
Some notable examples:
- 2.1 - a smooth brick
- 0.9 - a typical bicycle plus cyclist
- 0.7 to 1.1 - typical values for a Formula 1 car (wing settings change for each circuit)
- 0.7 - Caterham Seven
- at least 0.6 - a typical truck
- 0.57 - Hummer H2, 2003
- 0.51 - Citroën 2CV
- over 0.5 - Dodge Viper
- 0.44 - Toyota Truck, 1990-1995
- 0.42 - Lamborghini Countach, 1974
- 0.42 - Triumph Spitfire Mk IV, 1971-1980
- 0.42 - Plymouth Duster, 1994
- 0.39 - Dodge Durango, 2004
- 0.39 - Triumph Spitfire, 1964-1970
- 0.38 - Volkswagen Beetle
- 0.38 - Mazda Miata, 1989
- 0.372 - Ferrari F50, 1996
- 0.36 - Eagle Talon, mid-1990s
- 0.36 - Citroën DS, 1955
- 0.36 - Ferrari Testarossa, 1986
- 0.36 - Opel GT, 1969
- 0.36 - Honda Civic, 2001
- 0.36 - Citroën CX, 1974 (the car was named after the term for drag coefficient)
- 0.355 - NSU Ro 80, 1967
- 0.34 - Ford Sierra, 1982
- 0.34 - Ferrari F40, 1987
- 0.34 - Chevrolet Caprice, 1994-1996
- 0.34 - Chevrolet Corvette Z06, 2006
- 0.338 - Chevrolet Camaro, 1995
- 0.33 - Dodge Charger, 2006
- 0.33 - Audi A3, 2006
- 0.33 - Subaru Impreza WRX STi, 2004
- 0.33 - Mazda RX-7 FC3C, 1987-91
- 0.33 - Citroen SM, 1970
- 0.32064 - Volkswagen GTI Mk V, 2006 (0.3216 with ground effects)
- 0.32 - Toyota Celica,1995-2005
- 0.31 - Citroën GS, 1970
- 0.31 - Renault 25, 1984
- 0.31 - Citroën AX, 1986
- 0.31 - Mazda RX-7 FC3S, 1986-91
- 0.31 - Eagle Vision
- 0.30 - Saab 92, 1947
- 0.30 - Audi 100, 1983
- 0.30 - Porsche 996, 1997
- 0.30 - BMW E90, 2006
- 0.29 - Dodge Charger Daytona, 1969
- 0.29 - Honda CRX HF 1988
- 0.29 - Subaru XT, 1985
- 0.29 - BMW 8-Series, 1989
- 0.29 - Porsche Boxster, 2005
- 0.29 - Chevrolet Corvette, 2005
- 0.29 - Mazda RX-7 FC3S Aero Package, 1986-91
- 0.29 - Lancia Dedra, 1990-1998
- 0.29 - Honda Accord Hybrid, 2005
- 0.29 - Lotus Elite, 1958
- 0.29 - Mercedes-Benz W203 C-Class Coupe, 2001 - 2007
- 0.28 - Toyota Camry and sister model Lexus ES, 2005
- 0.28 - Porsche 997, 2004
- 0.28 - Renault 25 TS, 1984
- 0.28 - Saab 9-3, 2003
- 0.27 - Infiniti G35, 2002 (0.26 with "aero package")
- 0.27 - Mercedes-Benz W203 C-Class Sedan, 2001 - 2007
- 0.27 - Rumpler, 1921
- 0.27 - Toyota Camry Hybrid, 2007
- 0.26 - Alfa Romeo Disco Volante, 1952
- 0.26 - Hotchkiss Gregoire, 1951
- 0.26 - Mercedes-Benz W221 S-Class, 2006
- 0.26 - Toyota Prius, 2004
- 0.26 - Vauxhall Calibra, 1989
- 0.25 - Dymaxion, 1933
- 0.25 - Honda Insight, 1999
- 0.24 - Audi A2 1.2 TDI, 2001
- 0.212 - Tatra T77a, 1935
- 0.20 - Loremo Concept, 2006
- 0.20 - Opel Eco Speedster Concept, 2003
- 0.195 - General Motors EV1, 1996
- 0.19 - Alfa Romeo BAT Concept, 1953
- 0.19 - Dodge Intrepid ESX Concept , 1995
- 0.19 - Mercedes-Benz "Bionic Car" Concept, 2005 [1] (based on the boxfish)
- 0.16 - Daihatsu UFEIII Concept, 2005
- 0.16 - General Motors Precept Concept, 2000
- 0.14 - Fiat Turbina Concept, 1954
- 0.137 - Ford Probe V prototype, 1985
Figures given are generally for the basic model. Faster and more luxurious models often have higher drag, thanks to wider tires and extra spoilers.
See also
External links
- A. Filippone's Advanced Topics in Aerodynamics: Drag
- Danish Wind Industry Association: Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines: Drag
- Improving Aerodynamics to Boost Fuel Economycs:Součinitel odporu
de:Strömungswiderstandskoeffizient it:coefficiente di resistenza aerodinamica