Noise pollution

From Free net encyclopedia

(Redirected from Environmental noise)

Noise pollution is unwanted human-created sound that disrupts the environment. The dominant form of noise pollution is from transportation sources, principally motor vehicles, aircraft noise and rail transport noise. Other diverse sources are factories, amplified music, air-conditioners, and construction work. Noise regulation by governmental agencies effectively began in the U.S. in the year 1972 with passage of the Federal Noise Control Act. Noise pollution refers to any offending noise which comes from an external source, and it is equivalently referred to as environmental noise. The word noise comes from the Latin word nausea meaning seasickness.

Contents

[edit]

Sources of noise

Template:Main articles

The overarching cause of most noise worldwide is generated by transportation systems, principally motor vehicle noise, but also including aircraft noise and rail noise. Hybrid vehicles for road use are the first widely sold automobiles in 100 years to achieve significant noise source reduction. Poor urban planning may also give rise to noise pollution, since juxtaposition of industrial to residential land uses, for example, often results in adverse consequences for the residential acoustic environment.

Besides transportation noise, other prominent sources are office equipment, factory machinery, appliances, power tools, lighting hum and audio entertainment systems. With the popularity of digital audio player devices, individuals in a noisy area may tend and increase the volume in order to drown out ambient sounds.

[edit]

Human health

Template:Main

Principal noise health effects are both health and behavioral in nature. The following discussion refers to sound levels that would be present within 30 to 150 meters from a moderately busy highway.

[edit]

Hearing

The mechanism for chronic exposure to noise leading to hearing loss is well established. The elevated sound levels cause trauma to the cochlear structure in the inner ear, which gives rise to irreversible hearing loss The pinna (visible portion of the human ear) combined with the middle ear amplifies sound levels by a factor of 20 when sound reaches the inner ear. In Rosen's seminal work on serious health effects regarding hearing loss and coronary artery disease, one of his findings derived from tracking Maaban tribesmen, who were insignificantly exposed to transportation or industrial noise. This population was systematically compared by cohort group to a typical U.S. population. The findings proved that aging is an almost insignificant cause of hearing loss, which instead is associated with chronic exposure to moderately high levels of environmental noise.

[edit]

Cardiovascular health

High noise levels can contribute to Cardiovascular effects and exposure to the reference sound level during a single day would cause a statistical rise in blood pressure of five to ten mmHg; a clear and measurable increase in stress (medicine) Template:Ref; and vasoconstriction leading to the increased blood pressure noted above as well as to increases in coronary artery disease.

[edit]

Other effects

There are also potential adverse effects on libido and sexual performance. Health aspects receive less notice than annoyance effects Template:Ref. Occupational stress is identified in a recent U.S. national survey to encompass one fourth of all occurrences of this phenomenon, and noise was identified by the National Institutes of Health as a leading cause of workplace stressTemplate:Ref.

[edit]

Annoyance

Though it pales in comparison to the health effects noted above, noise pollution constitutes a significant factor of annoyance and distraction in modern artificial environments:

  1. The meaning listeners attribute to the sound influences annoyance, so that, if listeners dislike the noise content, they are annoyed.
  2. If the sound causes activity interference, noise is more likely to annoy (for example, sleep disturbance)
  3. If listeners feel they can control the noise source, the less likely the noise will be annoying.
  4. If listeners believe that the noise is subject to third party control, including police, but control has failed, they are more annoyed.
  5. The inherent unpleasantness of the sound causes annoyance. What is music to one is noise to another.

A 2005 study by Spanish researchers found that in urban areas households are willing to pay approximately four euros per decibel per year for noise reductionTemplate:Ref.

[edit]

Environment

Noise pollution can also be harmful to animals. High noise levels may interfere with the natural cycles of animals, including feeding behavior, breeding rituals and migration paths. The most significant impact of noise to animal life is the systematic reduction of usable habitat, which in the case of endangered species may be an important part of the path to extinction. Perhaps the most sensational damage caused by noise pollution is the death of certain species of beaked whales, brought on by the extremely loud (up to 200 decibels) sound of military SONAR.

[edit]

Personal protection

Image:Disposable foam earplugs.jpg Two common forms of protection against noise are earplugs and earmuffs. These are available over a range of applications, effectiveness and quality.

[edit]

Mitigation and control of noise

Template:Main

There is also technology that has been applied with the aim of mitigating or containing noise as much as possible, provided that it has a sufficiently localized source.

  • Roadway noise is the most widespread environmental component of noise pollution worldwide. There are a variety of effective strategies for mitigating adverse sound levels including: use of noise barriers, limitation of vehicle speeds, alteration of roadway surface texture, limitation of heavy duty vehicles, use of traffic controls that smooth vehicle flow to reduce braking and acceleration, innovative tire design and other methods. Thousands of case studies in the U.S. alone have been documented starting in 1970, indicating substantial improvement in roadway planning and design. The most important factor in applying these strategies is a computer model for roadway noise, that is capable of addressing local topography, meteorology, traffic operations and hypothetical mitigation. Costs of building in mitigation is often quite modest, provided these solutions are sougnt in the planning stage of a roadway project.
  • Aircraft noise can be reduced to some extent by design of quieter jet engines, which activity was pursued vigorously in the 1970s and 1980s. This strategy has had limited but noticeable improvement on urban sound levels. Operational controls, such as altering flight paths and time of day runway use, have demonstrated significant benefits for residential populations near airports. FAA sponsored residential retrofit (insulation) programs initiated in the 1970s has also enjoyed widespread success in reducing interior residential noise in thousands of affected residences across the United States.
  • Industrial noise for worker exposure has the longest history of scientific study, having been addressed since the 1930s. This practice has emphasized redesign of industrial equipment, shock mounting assemblies and physical barriers in the workplace. These pursuits have had considerable success; however, the costs of retrofitting existing systems is often rather high.
[edit]

Legal status

Template:Main

Governments up until the 1970s viewed noise as a "nuisance" rather than an environmental problem. In the United States there are federal standards for highway and aircraft noise; states and local governments typically have very specific statutes on building codes, urban planning and roadway development. In Canada and the EU there are few national, provincial, or state laws that protect against noise. As a result in Canada and the EU, most regulation has been left up to municipal authorities.

Noise laws and ordinances vary widely among municipalities and indeed do not even exist in some cities. An ordinance may contain a general prohibition against making noise that is a nuisance, or it may set out specific guidelines for the level of noise allowable at certain times of the day and for certain activities. Exceptions are generally made for activities considered essentail public services such as refuse collection and emergency vehicles.

Most city ordinances prohibit sound above a threshhold intensity from trespassing over property line at night, typically between 10 pm and 6 am, and during the day restricts it to a higher decibel level; however, enforcement is uneven. Many municipalities do not follow up on complaints. Even where a municipality has an enforcement office, it may be unwilling to do more than issue warnings, since taking offenders to court is expensive. For persistent nuisances, individuals may have to seek damages through the civil courts. Many jurisdictions, such as New York City and Chicago, Illinois authorize police to impound cars with loud stereos and to hold the cars as evidence until the citation has been adjudicated.

Many conflicts over noise pollution are handled by negotiation between the emitter and the receiver. If this has no effect, the next step is typically a phone call to the non-emergency police number, and filing of a written report. Clear documentation, repetitive complaints, getting neighbors involved, and forming a neighborhood watch can be effective at obtaining enforcement, as can contacting one's police chief, city manager, mayor or local area representative. Noise pollution often persists because only five to ten percent of people affected by noise will lodge a formal complaint. Many citizens are not aware of their legal right to quiet and do not know how to register a complaint.

[edit]

Bibliography

  1. Template:Note NIOSH Publication No. 99-101, U.S. National Institutes of Occupational Health (2006)
  2. Template:Note S. Rosen and P. Olin, Hearing Loss and Coronary Heart Disease, Archives of Otollaryngology, 82:236 (1965)
  3. Template:Note Jesús Barreiro, Mercedes Sánchez, Montserrat Viladrich-Grau (2005), "How much are people willing to pay for silence? A contingent valuation study", Applied Economics, 37 (11)
  4. Template:Note Thomas H. Fay, Noise and Health, New York Academy of Medicine (1991)
[edit]

See also

[edit]

External links

[edit]

Geographical links

es:Contaminación acústica fr:Pollution sonore gl:Contaminación acústica pt:Poluição sonora fi:Melusaaste sv:Buller

Retrieved from "http://www.netipedia.com/index.php/Noise_pollution"