Jesse Dirkhising
From Free net encyclopedia
- redirect Template:Not verified
Jesse Dirkhising (May 24, 1986–September 26, 1999) was a 13-year-old American boy who was raped, tortured, and murdered by two homosexuals in 1999. His murder was used by conservative interest groups to argue that this was the result of homosexuality, and that the mainstream media was downplaying the story out of a concern for political correctness. Template:Citeneeded.
Background
On September 26, 1999, police in Rogers, Arkansas, responded to a 911 call and went to the home of David Carpenter, 38. There they found Joshua Brown, 22, described as Carpenter's lover. They also found Jesse Dirkhising, a 13-year-old boy from nearby Prairie Grove, tied to a mattress. Police investigation determined that Dirkising had been repeatedly anally raped over a period of hours, including with foreign objects. His ankles, knees and wrists had been bound in duct tape and he was gagged and blindfolded with his own underpants, held in place with a bandanna. He had been administered a sedative. He died in hospital shortly afterwards, his death attributed to asphyxia.
In March 2001 Brown was found guilty of first-degree murder and rape. He was sentenced to life in prison, and this sentence was upheld on appeal by the Arkansas Supreme Court in September 2003. In April, Carpenter pleaded guilty to similar charges and was also sentenced to life.
Controversy surrounding the murder
On October 22, 1999, The Washington Times, ran a story headed: "Media tune out torture death of Arkansas boy." The story contrasted the alleged lack of coverage of the Dirkhising case with the treatment the murder of Matthew Shepard received. The story quoted Tim Graham, the director of media studies at Media Research Center, a watchdog group that documents what it perceives as liberal bias in the media for the conservative movement, as saying, "Nobody wants to say anything negative about homosexuals. Nobody wants to be seen on the wrong side of that issue." Template:Citeneeded.
This theme was then picked up by other media outlets and commentators. Bill O'Reilly wrote: "The question is stark and brutal. If the murder of Matthew Shepard, a gay man, by two drunken thugs in Laramie, Wyoming, was a national story and a heinous hate crime, why wasn't the killing of 13-year-old Jesse Dirkhising publicized the same way? Jesse was tortured, sodomized and finally killed by a gay man as another homosexual watched in the small town of Rogers, Arkansas. Yet the national media ignored the crime, causing outrage among those who see hate crimes as a tool being used to hammer the agendas of special interests. The two men who murdered Shepard have been convicted and, most likely, will spend the rest of their lives in prison. But the two men allegedly involved in the killing of Jesse Dirkhising have yet to be tried, and when they are, you may not even hear about it."
Gay conservative commentator Andrew Sullivan wrote an article in The New Republic accusing the "liberal media" of caving into political correctness and using the opportunity to attack the Human Rights Campaign for its support of hate crime legislation. Template:Citeneeded.
In the month after Shepard's murder, Nexis recorded 3,007 stories about his death. In the month after Dirkhising's murder, Nexis recorded 46 stories about his.Template:Citeneeded
Rebutal of Bias Argument
On November 14, 1999, E. R. Shipp, ombudsman at The Washington Post, noted that: "readers, prodded by commentators who are hostile to homosexuals and to what they view as a ‘liberal’ press" had raised questions about the Dirkhising case. She noted that the Post had run a story from the Associated Press on the Dirkhising murder. Shipp, said however, that she "made a clear distinction" between the Dirkhising and Shepard cases: "Matthew Shepard’s death sparked public expressions of outrage that themselves became news," she wrote. "That Jesse Dirkhising’s death has not done so is hardly the fault of the Washington Post." This stance by Shipp led to a journalistic exchange between her and Joseph Farah of the World Net Daily. Template:Citeneeded
On 4 November 1999, Jonathan Gregg addressed the issue in Time magazine. He asked: "Could it be because we in the media elite were unwilling to publicize crimes committed by homosexuals because it didn't suit our agenda? The next stop in that line of reasoning was clear: That news is controlled by a bunch of gay-loving liberals only too happy to wield a double standard."
Gregg discussed what he saw as the differences between the Shepard and Dirkhising cases: "The most salient difference between the Shepard case and this one is that while Shepard's murderers were driven to kill by hate, the boy's rape and death was a sex crime. It was repulsive, unconscionable — and the predictable pastime of perverted criminals... Matthew Shepard died not because of an all-too-common sex crime, but because of prejudice. Essentially, Shepard was lynched — taken from a bar, beaten and left to die because he was the vilified "other," whom society has often cast as an acceptable target of abuse; Dirkhising was just "another" to a pair of deviants. And while child abuse is unfortunately no big news, lynching still is."
The reason the Dirkhising case had not received national media attention, Gregg wrote, was "because it offered no lessons. Shepard's murder touches on a host of complex and timely issues: intolerance, society's attitudes toward gays and the pressure to conform, the use of violence as a means of confronting one's demons. Jesse Dirkhising's death gives us nothing except the depravity of two sick men. There is no lesson here, no moral of tolerance, no hope to be gleaned in the punishment of the perpetrators."
Other commentators said the difference was while the Dirkhising case was found to be motivated by sex - that is two men who raped another for sex, the Shepard case was found to be motived on the basis of sexual orientation and as such made it distinct in that it targeted a whole segment of society and not just one individual.Template:Citeneeded