Operational art

From Free net encyclopedia

Image:Mergefrom.gif It has been suggested that Operational warfare be merged into this article or section. ([[{{{2|: talk:Operational_art}}}|Discuss]])

Operational art is a methodology in military art that ultimately translates strategic aims into a coherent series of tactical missions. It has traditionally been associated with the operational level in the military hierarchy, which is situated between the strategic and tactical levels. Operational art, and the operational level, were first articulated by Soviet military theorists following the Russian Civil War. In the 1920s and 1930s, such military specialists as Lev Kamenev, Georgii Isserson, Pavel Varfolomeev, Alexsandr Svechin, Vladimir Triandafillov, and Mikhail Tukhachevsky helped to define and develop these principles of the operational level.

Operational art is, at its core, a methodology for fighting systems. A system by definition is a group of interdependent elements forming a complex whole. The very rapid economic, political, and technological developments that occurred from the nineteenth to the twentieth centuries had a great impact on warfare, making way for million-man armies armed with highly destructive weaponry. Nations themselves required total commitment of their resources and citizens to make war, in turn, total. Thus, war became larger than ever before, and armies possessed incredible resiliency due to their greater size, the interdependence of weapon systems, and the increased pace of transport due to rail and other modern technological means. Also, the complex infrastructure between the military front and the industrial base of the civilian rear became the strategic engine for total war. Because of all these factors, tactics alone could not be expected to achieve decisive strategic success—as the First World War was to prove. Only by viewing enemy armies as systems, and finding ways to isolate, freeze, or shock them, could an army be fragmented into its separate parts, and more easily destroyed through tactical attrition.

This is not to say that operational art was not practiced before the twentieth century. It may have not been a cognitive concept before Soviet military theorists put words to the principle, but examples of its use in warfare exist throughout history. For example, the Mongols were astute practitioners of operational art.

Also, operational art is not necessarily limited to the operational level. So long as strategic aims can be met, operational art can be practiced at whatever level is most useful or advantageous.bg:Оперативно изкуство