Postmodern philosophy
From Free net encyclopedia
Postmodern philosophy is an eclectic and elusive movement characterized by its criticism of Western philosophy. Beginning as a critique of Continental philosophy, it was heavily influenced by phenomenology, structuralism and existentialism, including both Soren Kierkegaard and Martin Heidegger. It was also influenced to some degree by Ludwig Wittgenstein's later criticisms of analytic philosophy.
For the most part, postmodern philosophy has spawned a huge literature of critical theory. Other areas of production have included deconstruction and several areas beginning with the prefix "post-", such as post-structuralism, post-Marxism, and post-feminism.
Postmodern philosophy claims to be especially skeptical about simple binary oppositions that allegedly dominate Western metaphysics and humanism, such as the expectation that the philosopher may cleanly isolate knowledge from ignorance, social progress from reversion, dominance from submission, or presence from absence.
The claim that philosophers in the past believed that they could separate these things neatly and cleanly is specious, however. Sophisticated philosophers have always known that, for example, progress and regress are comparative terms, the same as tall and short.
To some critics, postmodern skepticism appears similar to relativism or even nihilism. Defenders of post-modernism would argue that there is a distinct difference, however: while relativism and nihilism are generally viewed as an abandonment of meaning and authority, postmodern philosophy is generally viewed as an openness to meaning and authority from unexpected places, so that the ultimate source of authority is the "play" of the discourse itself (rather like Adam Smith's invisible hand of the market). Hence, postmodern philosophy may be understood as a form of authoritarianism.
Contents |
History of postmodern philosophy
Early influences in postmodern philosophy
Postmodern philosophy originated primarily in France during the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. However, it was greatly influenced by the writings of several earlier 20th century philosophers, including phenomenologists Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan, structuralist Roland Barthes, and the sometimes logician Ludwig Wittgenstein. Postmodern philosophy also drew from the world of the arts, particularly Marcel Duchamp and artists who practiced collage.
Early postmodern philosophers
The most influential early postmodern philosophers were Michel Foucault, Jean-François Lyotard, and Jacques Derrida. Foucault approached postmodern philosophy from a historical perspective, building upon structuralism, but at the same time rejecting structuralism by re-historicizing and destabilizing the philosophical structures of Western thought. He also considered how knowledge is defined and changed by the operation of power.
In America, the most famous postmodernist is Richard Rorty. Originally an analytic philosopher, Rorty believed that combining Davidson's criticism of the dualism between conceptual scheme and empirical content with Quine's criticism of the analytic-synthetic distinction allowed for an abandonment of the view of the mind as a mirror of a reality or external world. He argued that truth was not "out-there", but was in language and language was whatever served our purposes in any particular time; ancient languages are sometimes untranslatable into modern ones. Donald Davidson is not usually considered a postmodernist, although he and Rorty have both acknowledged that there are few differences between their philosophies1.
The writings of Lyotard were largely concerned with the role of narrative in human culture, and particularly how that role has changed as we have left modernity and entered a "postindustrial" or postmodern condition. He argued that modern philosophies legitimized their truth-claims not (as they themselves claimed) on logical or empirical grounds, but rather on the grounds of accepted stories (or "metanarratives") about knowledge and the world -- what Wittgenstein termed "language-games." He further argued that in our postmodern condition, these metanarratives no longer work to legitimize truth-claims. He suggested that in the wake of the collapse of modern metanarratives, people are developing a new "language game" -- one that does not make claims to absolute truth but rather celebrates a world of ever-changing relationships (among people and between people and the world). This was obviously wishful thinking, since the postmodernists themselves and their offspring, the neocons who run the whitehouse as of 2006, are clearly, all of them, absolutists who brook no challenge and answer no critic. The "alternative metanarratives" Lyotard tells us all to expect have never appeared. Instead, people are living under very truncated and mean versions of the old metanarratives, including Lyotard's metanarrative about the end of mean metanarratives and the emergence of nice, multiculti ones.
Derrida, the father of deconstruction, practiced philosophy as a form of textual criticism. He criticized Western philosophy as privileging the concept of presence and logos, as opposed to absence and markings or writings. Derrida thus claimed to have deconstructed Western philosophy by arguing, for example, that the Western ideal of the present logos is undermined by the expression of that ideal in the form of markings by an absent author. Thus, to emphasize this paradox, Derrida reformalized human culture as a disjoint network of proliferating markings and writings, with the author being absent.
Though Derrida and Foucault are cited as postmodern philosophers, each has rejected many of the other's views. Like Lyotard, both are skeptical of absolute or universal truth-claims. Unlike Lyotard, however, they are (or seem) rather more pessimistic about the emancipatory claims of any new language-game; thus some would characterize them as post-structuralist rather than postmodernist.
1 See this interview with Rorty[1] and Davidson's afterwords in "A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge"
Postmodernism and post-structuralism
Postmodern philosophy is very similar to post-structuralism; whether one considers the two identical or fundamentally different generally depends on how invested one is in the issues. People who are opposed to either postmodernism or poststructuralism often lump them together; advocates on the other hand make finer distinctions.
Postmodernism versus postmodernity
Postmodern philosophy is not, and cannot be an event in history any more than there is an era called the Kantian or the Utilitarian era. Nevertheless, the term "postmodernism" is often used to name the school. As a result, many people confuse postmodern philosophy with the social or cultural uses of the term, which are intended to name the characteristics of an era.
Among those who have written about postmodernity as if it were both a philosophy and the characteristic of an era, are the literary critic Fredric Jameson and the geographer David Harvey. They distinguish between postmodernity, which they use to describe an objective historical condition or situation, and postmodernism, which they use to describe a particular way of "talking" about things. They identified postmodernity with what the Marxist Ernest Mandel called "late capitalism," and have characterized postmodernism as the ideology of late capitalism. This is most useful, for the fact is that the reigning ideology in America (and there is almost nothing French about postmodern philosophy: it is almost entirely American) follows the lines of postmodern philosophy. There is no truth: and so, the whitehouse can say anything it wants as a justification of any action. "Did I just smelt a mountaintop and leave it in a valley? Well, you know, real Americans like industry."
Many say that postmodern philosophers exist or existed primarily to justify lies and lying. But they also exist to make themselves famous, and can hardly be expected to give a damn about anything other than that. Many believe that this is due to the fact that the movement consists mostly of borrowings from Continental philosophy that were selected for the sake of defending Affirmative Action. This attempt to create equality of outcomes by eliminating equality in requirements has been frequently cited as the fundamental tool that twisted the hard left on campus so badly that it emerged from its moral re-education as an ineffective, merely symbolic set of foolishnesses, and ceased to be a venue for economic, or any other form of real criticism. As such, postmodern philosophy looks reactionary, not progressive: which is to say that it exists to protect affirmative action, and not to achieve anything at all.
Another way that postmodern philosophy looks thoroughly reactionary is through its lineage. It is a continuation of German Idealism and Romanticism, both of which movements developed as reactions against the advance of science brought by the Enlightenment.