Powell Doctrine
From Free net encyclopedia
General Colin Powell made famous the so-called Powell Doctrine, also known as the Powell Doctrine of Overwhelming Force, as part of the run up to the 1990-1991 Gulf War.
The Powell Doctrine simply asserts that when a nation is engaging in war, every resource and tool should be used to achieve overwhelming force against the enemy. This may oppose the principle of proportionality, but there are grounds to suppose that principles of Just War may not be violated.
The Powell Doctrine is perhaps best illustrated by his quote (as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the 1991 Persian Gulf War) about the Iraqi Army:
- "First we're going to cut it off, then we're going to kill it."
After victory, the military should leave the field of engagement, rather than staying around as peacekeepers. (See International humanitarian law concerning military occupation.)
It has been argued that the Doctrine follows from principles laid out by Caspar Weinberger, Ronald Reagan's Secretary of Defense and, as such, Powell's former boss:
- Is a vital US interest at stake?
- Will we commit sufficient resources to win?
- Are the objectives clearly defined?
- Will we sustain the commitment?
- Is there reasonable expectation that the public and Congress will support the operation?
- Have we exhausted our other options?
- Do we have a clear exit strategy?
The questions posed by the Powell Doctrine:
- Is a vital national security interest threatened?
- Do we have a clear attainable objective?
- Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
- Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?
- Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
- Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
- Is the action supported by the American people?
- Do we have genuine broad international support?