Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested

From Free net encyclopedia

{{{1{{{1|}}}|

Shortcut:
{{{1|}}}
}}}

This page lists requests by the Arbitration Committee that it feels need to be enforced by Administrators. Admins are not required to enforce these rulings but they are required not to stop those that do. Only Arbitration Committee members and clerks can add new items to this page. If a block is needed, then the Admin who conducts it should indicate so after the listed item. Newer requests at top.

This page contains only active parts of a decision. For the full ruling, please see the respective decision page.

Contents

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/ZAROVE

The Arbitration Committee has reached a final decision in the Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/ZAROVE case. ZAROVE is prohibited from editing Acharya S or any related pages, and from making any comment on any page about her or her son. If ZAROVE violates either of the remedies in this decision, he may be briefly banned for up to two weeks for repeat offenses. After 5 such blocks the maximum block length shall be extended to one year. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lightbringer

In light of his continued and flagrant violation of his restrictions using sockpuppets, as documented by Category:Wikipedia:Suspected sockpuppets of Lightbringer and Wikipedia:Long term abuse/Lightbringer, Lightbringer is banned from Wikipedia for one year.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 11:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lapsed Pacifist

A final decision has been reached in the above arbitration case, and the case has been closed.

Template:Vandal is banned indefinitely from articles which relate to the conflict in Northern Ireland. The ban is intended to include any page in Wikipedia which Lapsed Pacifist engages in a dispute related in any way to the conflict in Northern Ireland.

If Lapsed Pacifist edits any article from which he is banned, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year. All blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lapsed Pacifist#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 19:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/-Ril- 2

The above arbitration case has closed. -Ril- is CheeseDreams evading her block. The -Ril- account is to be blocked indefinitely. CheeseDreams' ban is extended for an additional year.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 22:15, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Shiloh

The Arbitration Committee has reached a final decision in the above case, and the case is now closed.

  • The editors of Shiloh Shepherd Dog and its related articles and talk pages are placed under probation. For details, see the full decision.
  • Meatpuppets may be banned by any administrator for cause. For details, see the full decision.
  • The editors of Shiloh Shepherd Dog are warned to remain civil at all times during discussion on Wikipedia.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 18:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Tina_M._Barber has been blocked for one year. Kelly Martin (talk) 18:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Licorne

A final decision has been reached in the above arbitration case, and it has been closed.

The following remedies apply:

  • Licorne banned for a year
  • Licorne is placed indefinitely on Wikipedia:Probation
  • Licorne is placed indefinitely on personal attack parole.

Enforced by block.

Further details in the final decision (link above).

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 04:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

1 year block enacted. —BorgHunter ubx (talk) 04:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jason Gastrich

The above arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published.

Jason Gastrich is banned for one year for serious disruption. When he returns to editing, other restrictions will apply; these are detailed in the full final decision. In particular, he is indefinitely restricted to use of one editing account and indefinitely banned from editing the articles Louisiana Baptist University and The Skeptic's Annotated Bible.

For the arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 19:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood 3

The arbitration committee has closed the above case.

Restrictions applying to Huaiwei:

  • Template:User3 is placed on General Probation indefinitely. Any three administrators may, for good cause, ban him from the site.

Restrictions applying to Instantnood:

  • Template:User3 is placed on General Probation indefinitely. Any three administrators may, for good cause, ban him from the site.

For details, see the final decision.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 18:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Boothy443

A final decision has been reached in the above arbitration case, and the case has been closed.

Template:User3 is subject to a personal attack parole. If he engages in personal attacks, he may be briefly blocked. The maximum block length will be one week. Unlike the standard personal attack parole, the maximum block length will not be increased after five blocks. Blocks are to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Boothy443#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 17:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Temporary ban from Shiloh Shepherd Dog

This temporary injunction has been passed in the Shiloh arbitration:

1) Until the resolution of this case, {{{2|Tina M. Barber}}} (talk • contribs) and {{{2|ShenandoahShilohs}}} (talk • contribs) are banned from Shiloh Shepherd Dog.

This injunction has received the requisite four net support votes. If breached, it can be enforced by a short block. The ban does not apply to edits on Talk:Shiloh Shepherd Dog.

Enacted on 20:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 21:22, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Leyasu

The full details are in the case at the link above.

The remedies are:

Enforcement of paroles and probations is by blocking.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 19:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KDRGibby

(This is an old case that doesn't appear to be mentioned here.)

KDRGibby is placed on personal attack parole and prohibited from keeping personal attacks. He is also placed on both probation and general probation. These remedies are to be enforced by block. See the case for further details. On behalf of the arbcom, Johnleemk | Talk 18:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Dyslexic Agnostic final decision

This case has closed. Full details are in the final decision at the link above.

In brief:

  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow banned for six months On hold for duration of mentorship
  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow placed on personal attack parole
  • Dyslexic Agnostic placed on personal attack parole
  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow placed on Probation
  • Dyslexic Agnostic placed on Probation
  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow placed under Mentorship

Administrator enforcement is requested in the first instance to enforce the six month ban. On hold for duration of mentorship.

Two to three mentors, administrators knowledgeable in the case, are to be chosen at a later date.

While any administrators may enforce the ruling, the mentors should be seen as the primary enforcers, and other administrators are encouraged to communicate with them before taking actions. Additionally, the mentors are charged with monitoring and guiding T-man, and maintaining contact with him, as well as helping him to carry on productive communication with others towards the goal of successful collaboration. For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 15:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zeq

This arbitration case has closed. Zeq is banned from articles he has disrupted and placed on Probation. Zeq and Heptor are cautioned regarding sources. Zeq is cautioned regarding removal of well sourced information. Others are cautioned to use the procedures in Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. Where applicable, these remedies are to be enforced by block. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 09:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Appeal of VeryVerily

This arbitration case has closed. The one-revert per page per day remedy from Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily, and its associated enforcement, are vacated with respect to VeryVerily. However, the other still applicable remedy, namely that pertaining to discussion of reverts, and its associated enforcement, remain in force. Ruy Lopez is banned from using sockpuppets, and is placed on probation. VeryVerily may appeal to have the remaining remedy lifted in four months. The remedies will be enforced by block. For further details, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 15:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sortan

This arbitration case has closed. Jguk is banned from editing with respect to era notation. This will be enforced by block, as per Jguk's prior arbitration case. Sortan is also warned regarding stalking Jguk. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 09:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Theodore7

This arbitration case has closed. Theodore7 is banned for six months from editing astrology- or astronomy-related articles. He is also placed on personal attack parole for a year, and is required to use edit summaries for the next six months. These remedies will be enforced by blocking. For further details, please see the case. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 09:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/RJII v. Firebug

This arbitration case has closed. RJII is placed on personal attack parole, probation, general probation, and is cautioned regarding POV editing. Firebug is counseled that Wikipedia is a work in progress and that perfection is not to be expected. These remedies (where applicable) shall be enforced by a block of up to one year. For further details, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Johnleemk | Talk 08:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rajput

A final decision has been reached in this case and it has been closed.


Shivraj Singh, DPSingh , Gurkhaboy and all of their sock puppets and all users listed as the "Hindus only side" at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rajput/Evidence#involved_users are banned from editing Rajput and related articles. This is to be enforced by the usual escalating blocking policy.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 22:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Carl Hewitt

The Carl Hewitt case has closed.

Carl Hewitt is banned from autobiographical editing regarding himself and his work or that of his students. This ban includes creation of links and categories which refer to that work.

Carl Hewitt is placed on Wikipedia:Probation. He may be banned from any article which he disrupts.

Should Carl Hewitt edit any article from which he is banned, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 07:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pedophilia_userbox_wheel_war

As Template:User5 has continued to make edits relating to the pedophilia template which he was blocked for recreating and was unblocked only to respond to this case, pending resolution of this matter he is banned from editing any pages other than these Arbitration pages and his own user and talk page. He may be briefly blocked should he edit any other page. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 23:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The above temporary injunction is now obsolete and superceded by the final result of the case (which closed two weeks ago). For attempting to aggravate the dispute in order to make a point, Dschor is banned from Wikipedia for 2 months. Additionally, he is placed on Wikipedia:Probation. After he finishes serving out his ban, administrators may ban him from any page he disrupts, and/or ban him from Wikipedia for up to a week for each provocative edit he makes. If, after two months, Dschor can demonstrate good behavior, he may appeal the probation. Dschor and Paroxysm are prohibited from creating or editing userboxes (either templatized or hard-coded into a userpage). For attempting to aggravate the dispute in order to make a point, SPUI is banned from Wikipedia for 10 days. Additionally, he is placed on Wikipedia:Probation. After he finishes serving out his ban, administrators may ban him from any page he disrupts, and/or ban him from Wikipedia for up to a week for each provocative edit he makes. If, after two months, SPUI can demonstrate good behavior, he may appeal the probation. Johnleemk | Talk 09:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/EffK

EffK is banned from Wikipedia for one year (I have enforced this already). When he returns, he is banned from editing Catholicism articles, and may be banned from any articles he disrupts. Should EffK violate these prohibitions, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one year.

On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 10:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Beckjord

Beckjord and his socks are banned from Wikipedia for one year. When he comes back he may not edit articles related to the paranormal, interpreted broadly to include the likes of crop circles and Bigfoot. He is banned from sock puppetry, placed on personal attack parole, and general probation. He can be banned for disruption by any three administrators.

Blocks and bans are to be recorded at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Beckjordi#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

See the final decision for full details.


For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 06:40, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Benjamin Gatti

Benjamin Gatti is placed on probation for one year and on general probation indefinitely. Enforcement is by block, and blocks and bans under this decision are to be recorded at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Benjamin_Gatti#Log_of_blocks_and_bans See the final decision for details.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 18:22, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

User:TDC and anonymous Earthlink editor 165.247.xxx

The arbitration committee have banned them for the period of one year from editing Winter Soldier Investigation, to be enforced by blocking. They may also be blocked for making more than one content revert in any 24 hour period or failing to discuss any content revert. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Winter Soldier.

On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 18:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

User:Copperchair

The arbitration committee has banned this user indefinitely from editing Star Wars and War on Terrorism. He may be banned from other articles that he disrupts under the Wikipedia:Probation order in his case. To be enforced by block. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 04:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

User:Gibraltarian

The arbitration committee has decided to let the indefinite block on Gibraltarian stand. The following remedies will apply if and when he is ever unblocked by an administrator. It is recommended that he not be unblocked unless he promises to comply with this decision.

For the arbitation committee. Tony Sidaway|Talk 10:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Tommstein injunction

Template:Vandal is banned, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, from editing any page except those directly related to Arbitration involving him, and his own User and User Talk pages. He may be blocked for a short time, up to three days, for any edit violating this injunction, and all such edits may be reverted by any editor without regard to the limitations of the three revert rule. Dmcdevit·t 07:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Zeq and Ian Pitchford temporary injunctions

For constant edit warring, {{{2|Zeq}}} (talk • contribs) and {{{2|Ian Pitchford}}} (talk • contribs) are banned from editing Palestinian exodus and 1948 Arab-Israeli War until the conclusion of their case. See Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zeq. Dmcdevit·t 05:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

AndriyK banned, and other remedies

Per the final decision in AndriyK:

  • AndriyK is banned for one month from Wikipedia for creating irreversible page moves.
  • Until by consensus he has agreed to a suitable and mutually agreed naming convention using the guideline Wikipedia:Naming conflict, AndriyK is prohibited from moving pages, or changing the content of articles which relate to Ukrainian names, especially those of historical interest.
  • Should AndriyK move any page or change the content of any article to conform with his preferred usage before an agreement is reached as to a naming convention concerning historical Russian names and places he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall be increased to one year.
  • Moved pages which have become irreversible by [AndriyK] adding to the page history of the redirect page may be moved back without the necessity of a vote at Wikipedia:Requested moves.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Ciz (as amended)

If Ciz (using whatever account or IP address) edits Zoophilia or its closely related articles, or makes any edit which relates to zoophilia, bestiality, animal sexuality, or human-animal relationships in any article, or their talk pages, such changes made may be reverted by any editor and any administrator may, at his/her discretion, briefly block Ciz (up to a week in the case of repeat violations). After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year. As adopted by the Arbitration Committee 15:51, January 26, 2006 Kelly Martin (talk) 03:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


[edit]

Pigsonthewing banned for one year

{{{2|Pigsonthewing}}} (talk • contribs) (using whatever account or IP address) is banned from Wikipedia for a period of one year. As adopted by the Arbitration Committee 10:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC) Kelly Martin (talk) 04:21, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Implemented as 365-day block by Template:Admin 13:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit]

Wyss

According to checkuser Wyss has returned and edited as Template:Vandal. She and Template:Vandal are banned from editing articles which relate to homosexuality or bisexuality and are on general probation, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone#Proposed_remedies. Fred Bauder 19:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Everyking will not interact with or comment about Snowspinner

X) Everyking shall not interact with, or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about, Snowspinner, on any page in Wikipedia. Should he do so, he may be blocked by any administrator (other than Snowspinner) for a short time, up to one week; after the fifth such violation, the maximum block length shall be one year.

Kelly Martin (talk) 01:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

I blocked Everyking for a violation of the above for 24 hours on December 29, [1] and for 48 hours on January 7. [2] SlimVirgin (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit]

Temporary ban on Copperchair editing

1) As Template:Vandal has continued to edit war on a number of articles pending resolution of this matter, he is banned from editing any pages other then these Arbitration pages and his own user and talk page. He may be briefly blocked should he edit any other page, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Copperchair/Proposed_decision#Temporary_ban_on_Copperchair_editing. Fred Bauder 21:43, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Instantnood, Huaiwei, and SchmuckyTheCat

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Instantnood 2
  • Instantnood, Huaiwei, and SchmuckyTheCat are all placed on Probation for topics relating to China for a year. This means that any sysop, in the exercise of their judgement for reasonable cause, documented in a section of this decision, may ban them from any article which relates to China which they disrupt by inappropriate editing. In doing so, the sysop must notify the banned user on their talk page, and a note must also placed on WP:AN/I. They may post suggestions on the talk page of any article from which they are banned from editing. This remedy is crafted to permit them to continue to edit articles in these areas which are not sources of controversy.
  • Instantnood is restricted to proposing only one page move, poll of editors, or policy change relating to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese) per week.

James F. (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Comments please at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Huaiwei_and_User:SchmuckyTheCat_violating_probation_order. The claim is against User:Huaiwei and User:SchmuckyTheCat. enochlau (talk) 03:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

FuelWagon

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/FuelWagon v. Ed Poor
  • FuelWagon is banned, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, from editing any page except those directly related to Arbitration involving him, and his own User and User Talk pages. He may be blocked for a short time, up to three days, for any edit violating this injunction, and all such edits may be reverted by any editor without regard to the limitations of the three revert rule.

James F. (talk) 17:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Wonderfool

By emergency order of the Arbitration Committee, enacted 04:27, 28 November 2005 (UTC), {{{2|Wonderfool}}} (talk • contribs), having admitted [3] to creating several nihilartikels, at least one of which has not yet been identified to the community, is hereby banned from editing Wikipedia until such time as he identifies all undiscovered nihilartikels to the community, and further until he apologizes to the Wikipedia community for perpetrating a fraud upon the community.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin (talk) 04:27, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Blocked. Phil Sandifer 04:37, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

Pigsonthewing

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pigsonthewing
  • Pigsonthewing is banned, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, from editing any page in Karmafist's user space (but not user talk space). He may be blocked for a short time, up to three days, for any edit violating this injunction, and all such edits may be reverted by any editor without regard to the limitations of the three revert rule.
  • Due to repeated personal attacks, Pigsonthewing is subject, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, to a standard personal attack parole. Any administrator may ban Pigsonthewing for a short time, up to three days, for any edit which, in the opinion of that administrator, constitutes a personal attack.

James F. (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)


[edit]

User:Robert Blair, User:Robbie Blair, User:Rob Blair

Template:Vandal was ordered not to edit sex organ-related articles. Well, since then, two users (Template:Vandal and Template:Vandal) have shown up claiming to be Robert Blair and openly stating that the purpose of the accounts were to breach the ArbCom injunction. Can someone with sufficient access look into this and see if these are sock puppets or imposters and, if they are sock puppets, impose some stronger penalty? --Nlu 16:30, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Lightbringer

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lightbringer
  • Lightbringer is hereby banned indefinitely from editing articles and talk-pages related to Freemasonry (the closeness of the relation is to be interpretted by any sysop as they see fit, regardless of the article's title). If they violate this, a sysop may ban them for up to a week, and after five such bans, for up to a year.
  • Lightbringer is also placed on personal attack parole for six months from now (to expire on the 24 of May 2006). If they violate this, a sysop may ban them for up to a week.
  • This also applies to any sockpuppets; the list of Lightbringer's known sockpuppets is:

James F. (talk) 00:08, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

[From temp. injunction]

I blocked [the sockpuppets] indefinitely. --Ryan Delaney talk 18:28, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

Jguk banned from changing era notation

1) Based on continued editing solely for the purpose of removing BCE/CE notation from articles (see [4] [5]), Template:Vandal is prohibited from changing or removing any BCE/CE notation from any article, or making any edit intended to achieve that result, pending resolution of this matter. Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/jguk_2#Temporary_injunction


[edit]

Lightbringer banned from editing articles relating to freemasonry

Template:Vandal is banned from editing articles relating to freemasonry pending resolution of the arbitration case concerning him Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Lightbringer/Proposed_decision#Lightbringer.

Lightbringer appears to have created the sockpuppet Template:Vandal which exhibits the same editing pattern, thus violating the temporary injunction. Fred Bauder 20:49, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

Rktect banned from editing weights and measures

Template:Vandal is banned indefinitely from editing any article which relates to weights and measures (metrology). Rktect may be briefly blocked should he do so, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Rktect#Remedies

[edit]

Ban on editors involved in Bogdanov Affair

All user accounts used by participants in the external controversy (involving the Bogdanov Affari) are banned from Wikipedia pending resolution of this matter. The criteria for determining external involvement shall be a review of their edit history, it being presumed that if the vast majority of their edits were to the Bogdanov Affair and related pages such as this arbitration that they are not Wikipedia editors but persons involved in the external dispute. This group includes: Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal. Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal, Template:Vandal and all others who meet the criteria. {{{2|Rbj}}} (talk • contribs), a regular Wikipedia editor, and {{{2|Ze miguel}}} (talk • contribs), a new editor who has edited other areas, are banned from editing Bogdanov Affair, pending resolution of this matter.

A less restrictive injunction Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair/Proposed decision#Ban on editing Bogdanov Affair is under consideration and may replace the total bans. Fred Bauder 19:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Ban extended to talk page

See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Regarding_The_Bogdanov_Affair#Ban_extended_to_talk_page.

[edit]

Additional editors included

[edit]

Editors blocked following closing of the case

[edit]

Zen-master

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Zen-master
  • Zen-master is placed on Wikipedia:Probation for one year from the date of closing this case. Should any sysop feel that it is necessary that Zen-master be banned from an article where they are engaged in edit warring, removal of sourced material, POV reorganizations of the article, or any other activity which the user considers disruptive, they shall place a template {{Zen-master banned}} at the top of the talk page of the article, and notify them on their talk page. The template shall include the ending date of the ban (one year from this decision) and a link to Wikipedia:Probation. The template may be removed by any editor, including Zen-master, at the end of the ban. If Zen-master edits an article they are banned from, they may be briefly blocked from editing Wikipedia, up to a week for repeat offenses.
  • Zen-master is banned for one week for making personal attacks.

James F. (talk) 16:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

{{{2|Zen-master}}} (talk • contribs) is now banned from the English Wikipedia for a period of one year, ending on February 02, 2007. --Ryan Delaney talk 11:53, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

Limited ban on ArmchairVexillologistDon

2.3) User:ArmchairVexillologistDon is banned from the editing of any Wikipedia page related to vexillology, fascism, or Canada pending a decision their arbitration case. What constitutes "Vexillogy," "fascism," or "Canada" shall be interpreted broadly. Fred Bauder 21:15, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Yuber and Guy Montag

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Yuber
  • Yuber and Guy Montag are each placed on Wikipedia:Probation for one year from the date of closing this case. Should any sysop feel that it is necessary that either Yuber or Guy Montag be banned from an article where one of them is engaged in edit warring, removal of sourced material, POV reorganizations of the article, or any other activity which the user considers disruptive they shall place a template {{Yuber banned}} or {{Guy Montag banned}} as appropriate at the top of the talk page of the article, and notify them on their talk page. The template shall include the ending date of the ban (one year from this decision) and a link to Wikipedia:Probation. The template may be removed by any editor, including Yuber and Guy Montag, at the end of the ban. If Yuber or Guy Montag edit an article they are banned from, they may be briefly blocked from editing Wikipedia, up to a week for repeat offenses.
  • Yuber is instructed to use only this account, and no anonymous IPs. What editing constitutes Yuber's is up to any sysop to decide. If Yuber violates this, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to a week.
  • Guy Montag is banned from editing any article related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict for three months from the date of closing this case.

James F. (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

AI

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/AI
  • AI (under any username) is banned from Wikipedia pending the final resolution of all legal disputes with Wikipedia. Any edits AI attempts to make until this time, under any account or IP, should be immediately reverted.
  • AI is instructed to use only this account, and no anonymous IPs. What editing constitutes AI's is up to any sysop to decide. If AI violates this, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to a month for one-off offences, and up to a year for repeat offences.
  • Further, AI is banned from refactoring dialogue on talk pages, or rearranging any talk page, including material which constitutes "personal comments" or personal attacks (this applies to all talk pages except AI's own user talk page), and also banned from editing any article related to the Church of Scientology. If AI violates either of these, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to 24 hours for one-off offences, and up to a week per violation for repeat offences.

James F. (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

OldRight

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/OldRight
  • OldRight (under any username) is placed on Wikipedia:Probation for one year. This means that any administrator, in the exercise of their judgement for reasonable cause, documented in a section of this decision, may ban Old Right from any article he disrupts by inappropriate editing. OldRight must be notified on his talk page of any bans and a note must also placed on WP:AN/I. Should Old Right, using any account, edit any article from which he is banned, he may be briefly banned from Wikipedia, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses.

James F. (talk) 02:02, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Gabrielsimon

Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 09:53, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Dot Six temporary injunction

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/DotSix
  • DotSix, using any IP is prohibited from editing any Wikipedia page other than his talk page and the pages of this Arbitration case until a final decision is made in this case.

Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 22:07, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

Skyring

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Skyring
  • User:Skyring is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year for wikistalking from August 12, 2005
  • Ban reset for one year from September 1, 2005 for further wikistalking
  • The ban was reset several times over the past month, and now expires, subject to no further editing, on 20th October 2006. Rob Church Talk | FAHD 14:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

Internodeuser

[edit]

Irate (personal attack parole)

[edit]

Zivinbudas

[edit]

Tkorrovi and Paul Beardsell

[edit]

Netoholic

  • Netoholic is banned from all pages in the wikipedia and template namespaces for twelve months from 4 May 2005. He is restricted to one revert per day per page. These restrictions can be enforced by any admin with blocks at their discretion. see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Netoholic 2
[edit]

Trey Stone

[edit]

Njyoder

[edit]

LevelCheck

[edit]

John Gohde

[edit]

Rex071404

[edit]

Irate

[edit]

Baku Ibne, et al.

[edit]

Xed

[edit]

JonGwynne

[edit]

CheeseDreams and Rienzo

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CheeseDreams 2
  • Effective 3 Mar, 2005
  • User:CheeseDreams is banned for a total of one year until 3 Mar, 2006.
    • already implemented as part of a previous injunction
  • User:Rienzo is banned for 6 months until 3 September, 2005.
  • CheeseDreams is restricted to editing from the account User:CheeseDreams
  • CheeseDreams is a vexatious litigant. As such she is prohibited from initiating any requests for comment or requests for arbitration.
[edit]

WikiUser

[edit]

Robert the Bruce

  • Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Robert the Bruce
  • Effective 18 February, 2005
  • Robert the Bruce and associated sockpuppet accounts are banned for one year, until 18 February 2006
    • Blocking admin: CryptoDerk 23:58, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
  • Robert the Bruce is banned from all articles relating to sex or gender (in particular those relating to foreskin and circumcision) for a further year, until 18 February 2007
[edit]

Herschelkrustofsky

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche 2
  • Effective 17 February, 2005
  • Herschelkrustofsky is restricted to one account for editing.
  • Herschelkrustofsky is placed on POV parole for up to and including one year, until 17 February 2006. (Reset to 30 September 2006.[6])
  • Herschelkrustofsky is banned from editing any article relating to Lyndon LaRouche for up to and including one year, until 17 February 2006. (Reset to 30 September 2006.[7])
  • Herschelkrustofsky ban on editing LaRouche articles reset to March 31, 2007. [8]. Reset to 16 April, 2007.
  • Herschelkrustofsky is placed indefinitely on Wikipedia:Probation. If in the opinion of any three administrators, for good cause, he is responsible for disrupting the functioning of Wikipedia, restrictions may be placed on his editing, up to and including a general ban of one year. [9]
  • Banned from editing American System (economics), Anti-Defamation League, Dirigisme, and Synarchism in accordance with Nobs01 and Wikipedia:Probation
  • Two week general ban due to probable sock puppet use, negative personal comment, edit warring to promote LaRouche concepts.
[edit]

Gzornenplatz

[edit]

ChuckF

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Chuck F
  • Effective 6 Feb, 2005
  • ChuckF (and all user accounts and IP addresses used by him) are banned from editing any article related to libertarianism, socialism, or political ideology.
  • For 1 year, Chuck F is limited to 1 revert per article per day and must discuss all reverts on the relevant talk page. Until 6 Feb 2006.
[edit]

Vfp15

[edit]

Antifinnugor

[edit]

Rienzo, Lady Tara, Baffinisland, Nasse (Piglet) and NahChyps

''See also "CheeseDreams and Rienzo" above.

[edit]

Libertas

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Libertas
  • Effective 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Libertas and all sockpuppets are banned for a year, until 28 Jan, 2006.
  • Blocking admin:
    • 0:54, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Nutrosnutros (expires 20:54, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:54, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Anilingus (expires 20:54, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:54, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Billclinton (expires 20:54, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Fylc (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Viewvista (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Dean12 (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:53, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Suna (expires 20:53, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:52, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Jennypratt (expires 20:52, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:52, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Razalah (expires 20:52, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:52, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Ollieplatt (expires 20:52, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:51, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Salazar (expires 20:51, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
    • 20:50, 27 Jan 2005, Mackensen blocked Libertas (expires 20:50, 27 Jan 2006) (contribs) (unblock) (Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested)
  • Libertas is limited to one revert per twenty-four hour period
  • Libertas is prohibited from having any sockpuppet accounts
[edit]

-lothario-

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/168.209.97.34
  • Effective 22 January, 2005
  • -lothario- (168.209.97.34) is placed on POV parole for one year, until 22 January, 2006.
  • Further vandalism by -lothario- (168.209.97.34) may result in temporary blocks of up to a week by any administrator at the administrator's discretion.
[edit]

HistoryBuffEr

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/HistoryBuffEr and Jayjg
  • Effective 16 January 2005
  • HistoryBuffEr is prohibited for a period of one year from editing any article which relates to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict except in a restricted manner (see decision for full details). Until 16 January, 2006.
[edit]

CheeseDreams

See also "CheeseDreams and Rienzo" above.

[edit]

Ciz

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ciz
  • Effective January 10, 2005
  • Ciz (using whatever account or IP address) is banned from editing Zoophilia and its closely related articles, including their talk pages.
  • Ciz (using whatever account) is placed on standard personal attack parole indefinitely.
[edit]

Alberuni

[edit]

Lir

[edit]

Irismeister

[edit]

Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily

See also "Gzornenplatz" above

[edit]

Jimmyvanthach, Celindgren, and Tran Van Ba

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jimmyvanthach
  • Effective November 6, 2004
  • Jimmyvanthach/Celindgren (blocked indefinitely for other reasons) and Tran Van Ba (blocked indefinitely for other reasons) are banned from editing articles which relate to the royal family of Vietnam and articles which relate to the recent history and politics of Vietnam.
  • Edits by Jimmyvanthach, Celindgrenand and Tran Van Ba and obvious sockpuppets to articles which relate to the former royal family of Vietnam or to the recent history and politics of Vietnam may be removed by any user. In the event the banned users attempt to restore removed edits they may be banned by any administrator for a brief period (a day or less but up to a week in the event of repeat offenses).
[edit]

Kenneth Alan

[edit]

PolishPoliticians

[edit]

Cantus

  • Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Cantus vs. Guanaco
  • Effective November 24, 2004
  • Cantus is banned from editing Clitoris and Siberia and the articles' associated talk pages for a period of one year until November 24, 2005
  • Cantus is limited to one revert per article per 24 hour period. Should he violate this, an admin may ban him for a short period of time (up to a week).
[edit]

Mr-Natural-Health

See also "John Gohde" above

[edit]

Yuber Violation of RfAr

In keeping with Template:Vandal RfAr, Yuber is enjoined from being disruptive or engaging in revert wars.

Daniel Pipes is considered by many people to be an authoritative source on middle eastern and Islamic Affairs and is cited in several wikipedia articles with out any controversy. This extlink in question links to article by DP about the use of Nikah as front for sex tourism by wealthy arabs who make temporary marriages to poor muslim girls for money in india and elsewhere. After the marriage is consumated they return back to thier home countries. Yuber has previously engaged in editwars over the inclusion of links to articles by Daniel Pipes. These links were retained by general concensus on many other articles.

In the opinion of ArbCom Member Jayjg [10]:

It certainly looks like a violation of his Arbitration ruling to me, but perhaps you should get it clarified with the Arbitrators who ruled on it. Jayjg (talk) 23:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

I therefore humbly request enforcement of the RfAr, specifically I request.

  1. Under Enforcment section 1, that the template "Yuber Banned" be added to nikah as Yubers behavior on that article is not helpful or contructive.
  1. That the anon IP's previously editing the article by reverts be check as possible instance of Yuber's violating the No Sockpuppets portion of his RfAr.

Klonimus 01:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

I'd like to see you prove that people who removed the same link I have removed are somehow my "sockpuppets". Several people have disagreed with your inclusion of that irrelevant link and they are most assuredly not my sockpuppets. Also, please do not try and claim that I have not discussed my removal of the link. Yuber(talk) 01:38, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Yube, cmon get serious. You started a reverting before you even said anything on the talk page. And there is as of yet no concenus not to have that link. It seems that even months after Jizya you still refuse to at all comply to any standard of wikibehavior. Klonimus 08:49, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
I tried reverting the POV addition, but someone beat me to it. Yuber is/was not the only one who saw that addition as POV motivated anti-islamic trash --Irishpunktom\talk 16:33, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
" In the opinion of ArbCom Member Jayjg " Was Jayg one of the Arb comittee who passed judgement on this case? If I recall he is one of the people who used to get involved in long an internecine edit wars with the guy and was actually censured by the arb comittee for this. I'm not sure that "appeals to authority" are good here. Wrong authority. Unbehagen 13:20, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit]

Islam in the United States

I recently blocked two IPs, {{{2|24.7.210.91}}} (talk • contribs) and {{{2|70.156.143.25}}} (talk • contribs) for edit warring on Islam in the United States (talk · history · watch). I also semi-protected the article, and soon after {{{2|Yuber}}} (talk • contribs) and {{{2|CltFn}}} (talk • contribs) started editing the article, making exactly the same edits as the IPs. Not familiar with the details of this Arb, so I'll just note that here. --bainer (talk) 02:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

user:Yuber on Islamic extremist terrorism

Yuber as per the terms of his arbitration, can be banned from any islam-related article on which he is disruptive or participates in revert wars.

From the history page of Islamic extremist terrorism: [11] [12] [13]

Also from the user's own contributions history, he appears to have been stalking and warring with User:CltFn on several pages: [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

There are also a number of instances involving another user User:Mistress_Selina_Kyle but for the sake of brevity I am keeping this complaint to one; the history can easily be seen on Yuber's contributions list.

I believe this is unhelpful. I am formally requesting Yuber be banned from Islamic extremist terrorism. I reserve the right to file a formal request for more stringent restrictions should he continue to edit war elsewhere. Queeran 02:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit]

User Aucaman and Zionist Extremist Rhetoric

Dear admin, User:Aucaman chronically participates in repeatedly violating the 3rr policy, placing numerous dispute tags on articles, [unstoppable] possible sneaky vandalism, repeated violation of the personal attack policy by referring to multiple users as `racist` and other, going against the over-whelming consensus, refusing to compromise, and single-handedly hijacking this and two more articles. He has been engaged in a systematic campaign of misinformation, maliciously editing/disputing Persian people, pushing his POV, ignoring the majority consensus and authoritative sources, trying to establish new 'facts" based on his own personal assumptions, political beliefs, and racist comments. [26] He also repeatedly engages in racially-motivated personal attacks and possibly vandalizes the Persian people article which has resulted in the protection of page. Seemingly, he has single-handedly disrupted the integrity of the page in question, and perhaps other articles too. Furthermore, he is a chronic 3RR violator, but also violates other wikipedia rules by vandalizing and then removing warnings from his talk-page. [27] Would you please take a look at this issue and help us clean up the Persian people page? Please take a look at ( Talk:Persian people & Mediation/Persian_people ). ThanksZmmz 04:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)


[edit]

Onefortyone

User:Onefortyone has made edits in violation of his arbcom ruling at Talk:Elvis Presley#Interesting sources concerning Elvis's alleged bisexuality. The specific policies he is violating are pretty much every point noted at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Onefortyone#Findings of fact- He continues to allege that Elvis is Gay without providing concrete, verifiable sources; he arbitrarily cites authors who have written books about Elvis without providing page numbers for verification, and makes claims such as "Elvis's promiscuity masked latent homosexuality". I don't know if he actually thinks these are valid sources or if he is being intentionally disruptive, and I no longer care. He is clearly in violation of his RFA. --DDG 20:36, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

I have blocked him for 24 hours. --DDG 20:44, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
I do not think that this was necessary, as I only provided additional sources related to the topic on the discussion page. Interestingly, Ted Wilkes had not been blocked, although he repeatedly called me a "convicted liar", which is certainly a personal attack. Onefortyone 05:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit]

Kehrli

User:Kehrli is displaying unrelenting advocacy and original research. Note particularly his user page which is a diatribe against a notation accepted by IUPAC. His main user page represents original research. He has also been pushing his ideas on the page m/z misconception which has been deleted. Recently he has been pushing his ideas on the mass-to-charge ratio page. This page was at one point pure POV and was nearly identical to his user page. He has learned to be more slick recently with all of the criticism he has recieved, including from mediators. He, however, continues to push his ideas systematically and patiently disrupting the ability of other editors to improve articles. Mediation has failed as he ignores the criticism that shuts him completely down from pushing his ideas.

--Nick Y. 22:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://www.netipedia.com/index.php/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Admin_enforcement_requested"