Subset

From Free net encyclopedia

Image:Venn A subset B.png

In mathematics, especially in set theory, a set A is a subset of a set B, if A is "contained" inside B. The relationship of one set being a subset of another is called inclusion. Every set is a subset of itself.

More formally, If A and B are sets and every element of A is also an element of B, then:

• A is a subset of (or is included in) B, denoted by A ⊆ B,

or equivalently

• B is a superset of (or includes) A, denoted by B ⊇ A.

If A is a subset of B, but A is not equal to B, then A is also a proper (or strict) subset of B. This is written as A ⊂ B. In the same way, B ⊃ A means that B is a proper superset of A.

An easy way to remember the difference in symbols is to note that ⊆ and ⊂ are analogous to ≤ and <. For example, if A is a subset of B (written as A ⊆ B), then the number of elements in A is less than or equal to the number of elements in B (written as |A| ≤ |B|). Likewise, for finite sets A and B, if A ⊂ B then |A| < |B|.

There are other, equivalent interpretations, all of them important.

• If A is a subset of B, then <math>x \in A \rightarrow x \in B</math>.
• If A is a proper subset of B, then there exists at least one element x such that <math>x \in B</math> but <math>x \notin A</math>.

N.B. Many authors do not follow the above conventions, but use ⊂ to mean simply subset (rather than proper subset). There is an unambiguous symbol, <math>\subsetneq</math> (or ⊊ in Unicode), for proper subset. Some authors use both unambiguous symbols, ⊆ for subset and <math>\subsetneq</math> for proper subset, and dispense with ⊂ altogether. The corresponding remarks apply for supersets as well.

For any set S, inclusion is a relation on the set of all subsets of S (the power set of S).

Examples

• The set {1, 2} is a proper subset of {1, 2, 3}.
• The set of natural numbers is a proper subset of the set of rational numbers.
• The set {x : x is a prime number greater than 2000} is a proper subset of {x : x is an odd number greater than 1000}
• Any set is a subset of itself, but not a proper subset.
• The empty set, written ø, is also a subset of any given set X. (This statement is vacuously true, see proof below) The empty set is always a proper subset, except of itself.

Properties

PROPOSITION 1: The empty set is a subset of every set.

Proof: Given any set A, we wish to prove that ø is a subset of A. This involves showing that all elements of ø are elements of A. But there are no elements of ø.

For the experienced mathematician, the inference " ø has no elements, so all elements of ø are elements of A" is immediate, but it may be more troublesome for the beginner. Since ø has no members at all, how can "they" be members of anything else? It may help to think of it the other way around. In order to prove that ø was not a subset of A, we would have to find an element of ø which was not also an element of A. Since there are no elements of ø, this is impossible and hence ø is indeed a subset of A.

The following proposition says that inclusion is a partial order.

PROPOSITION 2: If A, B and C are sets then the following hold:

reflexivity:

• A ⊆ A

antisymmetry:

• A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A if and only if A = B

transitivity:

• If A ⊆ B and B ⊆ C then A ⊆ C

The following proposition says that for any set S the power set of S ordered by inclusion is a bounded lattice, and hence together with the distributive and complement laws for unions and intersections (see The fundamental laws of set algebra), show that it is a Boolean algebra.

PROPOSITION 3: If A, B and C are subsets of a set S then the following hold:

existence of a least element and a greatest element:

• ø ⊆ A ⊆ S (that ø ⊆ A is Proposition 1 above.)

existence of joins:

• A ⊆ A∪B
• If A ⊆ C and B ⊆ C then A∪B ⊆ C

existence of meets:

• A∩B ⊆ A
• If C ⊆ A and C ⊆ B then C ⊆ A∩B

The following proposition says that, the statement "A ⊆ B ", is equivalent to various other statements involving unions, intersections and complements.

PROPOSITION 4: For any two sets A and B, the following are equivalent:

• A ⊆ B
• A ∩ B  =  A
• A ∪ B  =  B
• A − B  =   ø
• B′ ⊆ A′

The above proposition shows that the relation of set inclusion can be characterized by either of the set operations of union or intersection, which means that the notion of set inclusion is axiomatically superfluous.

Other properties of inclusion

The usual order on the ordinal numbers is given by inclusion.

For the power set of a set S, the inclusion partial order is (up to an order-isomorphism) the Cartesian product of |S| (the cardinality of S) copies of the partial order on {0,1}, for which 0 < 1.be:Падмноства cs:Podmnožina de:Teilmenge et:Alamhulk es:Subconjunto fr:Sous-ensemble ko:부분집합 is:Hlutmengi it:Sottoinsieme he:תת קבוצה nl:Deelverzameling ja:部分集合 pl:Podzbiór ru:Подмножество sl:Podmnožica fi:Osajoukko sv:Delmängd uk:Підмножина zh:子集