MS-DOS
From Free net encyclopedia
{{Infobox_OS | name = MS-DOS | logo = Image:MS-DOS icon.png | screenshot = Image:StartingMsdos.png | caption = An example of MS-DOS's command-line interface, this one showing that the current directory is the root of drive C. | developer = Microsoft | family = DOS | source_model = Closed source | kernel_type = Monolithic kernel | working_state = Discontinued | latest_release_version = 8.0 | latest_release_date = September 14 2000 | ui = DOS CLI | license = Proprietary }}
MS-DOS is an operating system made by Microsoft. It was the most widely used member of the DOS family of operating systems. It was the dominant operating system for the PC compatible platform during the 1980s. It has gradually been replaced on consumer desktop computers with various generations of the Windows operating system.
MS-DOS was originally released in 1981 and had eight major versions released before Microsoft stopped development in 2000. It was the key product in Microsoft's growth from a programming languages company to a diverse software development firm, providing the company with essential revenue and marketing resources.
Contents |
History
MS-DOS was reverse-engineered from the CP/M-86 operating system, written by Digital Research. MS-DOS was created by computer manufacturer Seattle Computer Products (SCP) in 1980 as QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System), but was renamed 86-DOS because it was designed to run on the Intel 8086 processor. In a sequence of events that would later inspire much folklore, Microsoft licensed QDOS to IBM on behalf of SCP. Microsoft acquired the system for only $50,000 from SCP shortly before the PC's release.
Development
Image:Msdosad.jpg IBM and Microsoft both released versions of DOS; the IBM version was supplied with the IBM PC and known as PC-DOS. Originally, IBM only validated and packaged Microsoft developments, and thus IBM's versions tended to be released shortly after Microsoft's. However, MS-DOS 4.0 was actually based on IBM PC-DOS 4.0, as Microsoft was by then concentrating on OS/2 development. Microsoft released its versions under the name "MS-DOS", while IBM released its versions under the name "PC-DOS". Initially, when Microsoft would license their OEM version of MS-DOS, the computer manufacturer would customize its name (i.e. TandyDOS, Compaq DOS, etc). Most of these versions were identical to the official MS-DOS; however, Microsoft began to insist that OEMs start calling the product MS-DOS. Eventually, only IBM resisted this move.
Computer advertisements of this period often claimed that computers were "IBM-Compatible" or very rarely "MS-DOS compatible". The two terms were not synonyms. There were computers which used MS-DOS which could not run all the software that an IBM-Compatible machine could. An example is the Pivot, which used MS-DOS but was not IBM-Compatible.
Programs written specifically for IBM compatibles could run faster by bypassing slow MS-DOS functions, e.g. by writing video information directly to the area of memory assigned to it.
- PC DOS 1.0 - August 1981 - Initial release with the first IBM-PC
- PC DOS 1.1 - May 1982
- MS-DOS 1.25 - May 1982 - First release for non-IBM hardware
- MS-DOS 2.0 - March 1983 - Introduced subdirectories, handle-based file operations, command input/output redirection, and pipes. Microsoft decided to use backslashes as pathname separators rather than slashes as on Unix apparently due to the latter character being used as the switch character in most DOS and CP/M programs. Adds support for hard drives and 360KB floppy disks
- PC DOS 2.1 - October 1983
- MS-DOS 2.11 - March 1984
- MS-DOS 3.0 - August 1984 - Adds support for 1.2MB floppy disks and larger hard disks
- MS-DOS 3.1 - November 1984
- MS-DOS 3.2 - January 1986 - Supported 2 hard disk partitions of up to 32MB, one primary and one "logical drive" in an "extended partition"
- PC DOS 3.3 - April 1987
- MS-DOS 3.3 - August 1987 - Supported multiple logical drives
- MS-DOS 4.0 - June 1988 - actually derived from IBM's codebase rather than the reverse
- PC DOS 4.0 - July 1988 - added DOS Shell & support for hard disks of >32MB using the format from Compaq DOS 3.31. Also added many bugs and offered less free conventional memory than before. Generally regarded as an unsuccessful release and to be avoided
- MS-DOS 4.01 - November 1988 - bug-fix release
- MS-DOS 5.0 - June 1991 - Memory management, full-screen editor, QBasic programming language, online help, and DOS Shell gains task switcher. Also add file transfer facillity licenced from Rupp Technology (FastLynx)
- MS-DOS 6.0 - March 1993 - Added DoubleSpace disk compression and other features
- MS-DOS 6.2 - November 1993 - Bug fix release
- MS-DOS 6.21 - February, 1994 - Following Stac Electronics lawsuit, removed DoubleSpace disk compression
- PC DOS 6.3 - April 1994
- MS-DOS 6.22 - June 1994 - Last official stand-alone version. DoubleSpace replaced with non-infringing but compatible DriveSpace tool
- PC DOS 7.0 - April, 1995 - Bundles Stacker in place of DriveSpace
- MS-DOS 7.0 - August 1995 - Shipped embedded in Windows 95. Included Logical block addressing and Long File Name (LFN) support
- MS-DOS 7.1 - August 1996 - Shipped embedded in Windows 95B (OSR2) (and Windows 98 in June 1998). Added support for FAT32 file system
- MS-DOS 8.0 - September 2000 - Shipped embedded in Windows ME. Last version of MS-DOS. Removes SYS command, ability to boot to command line and other features
- PC DOS 2000 - Year 2000-compliant version with minor additional features. Final member of the MS-DOS family
Source: PC Museum
Competition and Development
On the IBM PC (and clones) platform, the initial competition to the PC-DOS/MS-DOS line came from Digital Research, whose CP/M-86 operating system had inspired MS-DOS. Digital Research continued to develop CP/M-86 and offer it to computer manufacturers as an alternate to MS-DOS and Microsoft's licensing requirements.
In the business world, the PC platform that MS-DOS was tied to faced competition from the Unix operating system which ran on many different hardware architectures. Microsoft even sold a version of Unix called Xenix. The Pick operating system was another alternative OS for the PC.
In the emerging world of home users, a variety of other hardware platforms were in serious competition with the IBM PC: the Apple II, early Apple Macintosh, the Commodore 64 and others. At first, the competition for these other platforms was with IBM PC computers running MS-DOS. With the advent of IBM PC clones all running on Intel processors, the name IBM became less important to home users. What was important was keeping up with Intel's steadily increasing clock speeds and the ability to run MS-DOS.
Microsoft and IBM together began what was intended as the follow-on to DOS, called OS/2. When OS/2 was released in 1987, Microsoft began an ad campaign announcing that "DOS is Dead", boldly proclaiming version 4 was the last full release.
MS-DOS had grown in spurts, with many significant features being taken (or duplicated) from other products and operating systems, as well as reverse-engineering tools and utilities including Norton Utilities, PC Tools (Microsoft Anti-Virus), QEMM expanded memory manager, Stacker disk compression, and so on. The advent of OS/2, which offered a number of advanced features which had been written together, was seen as the legitimate heir to the "kludgey" DOS platform.
Digital Research, recognizing the need to continue the lower-level platform represented by DOS, then developed DR DOS 5, which mirrored the OS/2 "platform integration" model by adding features which were available only as third-party add-ons for MS-DOS. Unwilling to lose any portion of the market, Microsoft responded by announcing the "pending" release of MS-DOS 5.0 in May of 1990. This effectively killed most DR DOS sales, until the actual release of MS-DOS 5.0 in June 1991. Digital Research brought out DR DOS 6, which sold well until the "pre-announcement" of MS-DOS 6.0 again stifled the sales of DR DOS.Template:Fact
The pact between Microsoft and IBM to promote OS/2 began to fall apart in 1990 when Windows 3.0 became a marketplace success. Much of Microsoft's further contributions to OS/2 also went in to creating a third GUI replacement for DOS, Windows NT
IBM, which had already been developing the next version of OS/2, carried on development of the platform without Microsoft and sold it as the alternative to DOS and Windows.
End of MS-DOS
MS-DOS has effectively ceased to exist as a product. It became the bootstrap for Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows ME but was integrated as a full product, thus ending the days of a stand-alone DOS. Today it is still used in various embedded x86 systems due to its simplistic architecture, minimal memory requirements, and minimal processor speed requirements.
Legal issues
As a response to Digital Research's DR-DOS 6.0, which bundled SuperStor disk compression, Microsoft opened negotiations with Stac Electronics, vendor of the most popular DOS disk compression tool, Stacker. Stac was unwilling to meet Microsoft's terms for licensing Stacker and withdrew from the negotiations. In the due diligence process, Stac engineers had shown Microsoft some Stacker source code.
Soon, MS-DOS 6.0 was released, including the Microsoft DoubleSpace disk compression utility program. Stac successfully sued Microsoft for patent infringement regarding the compression algorithm used in DoubleSpace. This resulted in the release of MS-DOS 6.21, which had disk-compression removed. Shortly afterwards came version 6.22, with a new version of the disk compression system, DriveSpace, rewritten to avoid the infringing code.
Prior to 1995, Microsoft licensed MS-DOS (and Windows) to computer manufacturers under three types of agreement: per-processor (a fee for each system the company sold), per-system (a fee for each system of a particular model), or per-copy (a fee for each copy of MS-DOS installed). The largest manufacturers used the per-processor arrangement, which had the lowest fee. This arrangement made it expensive for the large manufacturers to migrate to any other operating system, such as DR-DOS. In 1991 the US government Federal Trade Commission began investigating Microsoft's licensing procedures resulting in a 1994 settlement agreement limiting Microsoft to per-copy licensing. Digital Research did not gain by this settlement, and years later its successor in interest Caldera sued Microsoft for damages. This lawsuit was settled with a monetary payment of 150 million dollars.
Multitasking
MS-DOS was not designed to be a multi-user or multitasking operating system, but many attempts were made to add these capabilities. Terminate and Stay Resident (TSR) system call were originally designed for device drivers and extensible plugins that enhanced or added features. Companies such as Borland began to tap into the TSR design with products like SideKick. Add-on environments like TopView and especially DESQview attempted to provide multitasking, and achieved some success when later combined with the virtual 8086 mode and virtual memory features of the Intel 80386 and later processors.
User interface
MS-DOS employs a command line interface and a batch scripting facility via its command interpreter, command.com. MS-DOS was designed so users could easily substitute a different command line interpreter, for example 4DOS.
Beginning with version 4.0, MS-DOS included a file manager program with a quasi-graphical user interface (the DOS Shell) that featured menus, split windows, and program shortcuts using character mode graphics.
Windows NT
In Windows NT the native DOS-like command line is a native executable, cmd. The 16-bit command.com interpreter taken from MS-DOS 5.0 is still included to maintain application compatibility with programs that still expect it. The command "ver" returns the string "Microsoft(R) Windows DOS" when done from command.com, but "Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]" (or similar depending on the version of NT) when run from CMD.
MS-DOS compatibility with other Microsoft operating systems
From 1983 onwards various companies have worked on graphical user interfaces capable of running on PC hardware. With DOS being the dominant operating system several companies released alternate shells, e.g. Microsoft Word for DOS, XTree, and the Norton Shell. However, this required duplication of effort and did not provide much consistency in interface design (even between products from the same company).
Later, in 1985, Microsoft Windows was released as Microsoft's first attempt at providing a consistent user interface (for applications). The early versions of Windows ran on top of MS-DOS and its clones. At first Windows met little success BUT this was also true for most other companies efforts as well, for example GEM. After version 3.0 Windows gained marked acceptance.
Later versions (Windows 95, 98 and ME) used the DOS boot process to launch itself into protected mode. Basic features related to the file system, such as long file names, were only available to DOS when running as a subsystem of Windows. Windows NT ran independently of DOS but included a DOS subsystem so applications could run in a virtual machines under the new OS. With the latest Windows releases even dual booting MS-DOS is problematic as DOS can no longer read the basic file system.
Related systems
Several similar products were produced by other companies. In the case of PC-DOS and DR-DOS, it is common but incorrect to call these "clones". Given that Microsoft manufactured PC-DOS for IBM, PC-DOS and MS-DOS were (to continue the genetic analogy) "identical twins" that diverged only in adulthood and eventually became quite different products; DR-DOS was a clone of itself once removed.
- PC-DOS
- DR-DOS, Novell DOS, and OpenDOS
- FreeDOS, FreeDOS 32, and GNU/DOS
- PTS-DOS
These products are collectively referred to as DOS.
See also
- List of DOS commands
- Microsoft Windows
- History of Microsoft Windows
- Bad command or file name
- Comparison of MS-DOS and DOS-compatible operating systems
- DOSBox, x86 emulator with DOS.
External links
- Tim Patterson on DOS - Patterson wrote the QDOS OS
- Richard Bonner's DOS website
- Batfiles - the DOS batch file programming handbook and tutorial
- MS-DOS Reference
- A Brief Timeline of DOS
- Linux/dosemu
- Ralf Brown's Interrupt List
- NTFS4DOS - NTFS compatible DOS
- Old Os Information and downloads for MS-DOS users
- History of DOS
- DOSbox, a multiplatform DOS emulator
| MS-DOS–based: 1.0 • 2.0 • 3.0 • 3.1x • 95 • 98 • Me |
| NT-based: NT 3.1 • NT 3.5 • NT 3.51 • NT 4.0 • 2000 • XP • Server 2003 |
| CE-based: CE 3.0 • Mobile • CE 5.0 |
| Forthcoming: Vista • FLP (thin-client) • Server "Longhorn" • "Fiji" • "Vienna" |
ca:MS DOS cs:MS DOS da:MS-DOS de:MS-DOS es:MS-DOS eo:MS-DOS eu:MS-DOS fr:MS-DOS gl:MS-DOS ko:MS-DOS hr:MS-DOS id:MS-DOS it:MS-DOS ku:MS-DOS lv:MS-DOS lt:MS-DOS hu:MS-DOS nl:MS-DOS ja:MS-DOS no:MS-DOS pl:MS-DOS pt:MS-DOS ru:MS-DOS simple:MS-DOS sk:MS-DOS fi:MS-DOS sv:MS-DOS tr:MS-DOS zh:MS-DOS vi:MS-DOS