Wieferich prime

From Free net encyclopedia

In mathematics, a Wieferich prime is prime number p such that p² divides 2p − 1 − 1; compare this with Fermat's little theorem, which states that every prime p divides 2p − 1 − 1. Wieferich primes were first described by Arthur Wieferich in 1909 in works pertaining to Fermat's last theorem.

Contents

The search for Wieferich primes

The only known Wieferich primes are 1093 and 3511 Template:OEIS, found by W. Meissner in 1913 and N. G. W. H. Beeger in 1922, respectively; if any others exist, they must be > 1.25 · 1015 [1]. It has been conjectured that only finitely many Wieferich primes exist; the conjecture remains unproven until today, although J. H. Silverman was able to show in 1988 that if the abc Conjecture holds, then for any positive integer a > 1, there exist infinitely many primes p such that p² does not divide ap − 1 − 1.

Properties of Wieferich primes

A Mersenne number is defined as Mq = 2q −1 (where q is prime) and by Fermat's little theorem it is known, that Mp−1 (= 2p−1−1) is always divisible by a prime p.
Moreover, it may be, that with q being a primefactor of p−1 even Mq < Mp−1 is divisible by p.
From the definition of a Wieferich prime w it is, that 2w−1 −1 is divisible by w2 and not only by w.
Now q may be a factor of w−1, and Mq still divisible by w; so the question arises, whether there exist a Mersenne number Mq, which is also divisible by w2 or even may itself be a wieferich prime.
It can be shown, that
if w2 divides 2w−1−1, and w would divide Mq (= 2q−1), where q is a primedivisor of w−1
then also w2 must divide Mq; thus Mq would contain a square (and could not be prime).
The two known Wieferich primes w=1093 and w=3511 do not satisfy the condition of dividing a Mersenne number Mq with prime exponent q; so
no known Wieferich prime is a factor of a Mersenne number.
But whether this is generally impossible is not known currently; a more general notion of this question is: are all Mersenne numbers squarefree?
Since any Mq containing a Wieferich prime w must also contain w2, it follows immediately, it would not be prime. Thus
a Mersenne prime cannot be a Wieferich prime.
  • Cyclotomic generalization
For a cyclotomic generalization of the Wieferich property (np−1)/(n−1) divisible by w2 there are solutions like
(35 - 1 )/(3-1) = 112
and even higher exponents than 2 like in
(196 - 1 )/(19-1) divisible by 73
  • Also, if w is a Wieferich prime, then 2w² = 2 (mod w²).

Wieferich primes and Fermat's last theorem

The following theorem connecting Wieferich primes and Fermat's last theorem was proven by Wieferich in 1909:

Let p be prime, and let x, y, z be integers such that xp + yp + zp = 0. Furthermore, assume that p does not divide the product xyz. Then p is a Wieferich prime.

In 1910, Mirimanoff was able to expand the theorem by showing that, if the preconditions of the theorem hold true for some prime p, then p² must also divide 3p − 1. Prime numbers of this kind have been called Mirimanoff primes on occasion, but the name has not entered general mathematical use.

See also

External links

Further reading

  • A. Wieferich, "Zum letzten Fermat'schen Theorem", Journal für Reine Angewandte Math., 136 (1909) 293-302
  • N. G. W. H. Beeger, "On a new case of the congruence 2p − 1 = 1 (p2), Messenger of Math, 51 (1922), 149-150
  • W. Meissner, "Über die Teilbarkeit von 2pp − 2 durch das Quadrat der Primzahl p=1093, Sitzungsber. Akad. d. Wiss. Berlin (1913), 663-667
  • J. H. Silverman, "Wieferich's criterion and the abc-conjecture", Journal of Number Theory, 30:2 (1988) 226-237de:Wieferich-Primzahl

es:Número de Wieferich fr:Nombre de Wieferich fi:Wieferichin alkuluku zh:韋伊費列治素數