Seabird

From Free net encyclopedia

Seabirds are birds that spend much of their lives, outside the breeding season at least, at sea. Whilst the seabirds vary greatly in lifestyle, behaviour and physiology, they often exhibit striking convergent evolution as the same environmental problems and feeding niches have resulted in similar adaptions. Some seabird species, such as the albatrosses and petrels are truly pelagic, breeding on sea cliffs and small islands, and wintering on the open ocean. They are totally dependent on the sea for food. Other species such as the auks and cormorants tend to be more coastal. Some seabird species are marine for only part of the year, nesting inland in marshes and on lakes.

Seabirds live longer, breed later and have fewer young than other birds do, but they invest a great deal of time in those young that they do have. Most species nest in colonies, which can vary in size from a few dozen birds to many millions. They are famous for undertaking long annual migrations, crossing the equator or circumnavigating the earth in some cases. They feed both at the ocean's surface and below it, and even feed on each other.

Seabirds and humans have a long history together, they have provided food to hunters, guided fishermen to fishing stocks and sailors to land. Many species are currently threatened by human activities, and conservation efforts are underway to preserve them.

Image:Waved albatross nesting.jpg

Contents

Classification of species as seabirds

There exists no one definition of which groups, families and species are seabirds, and most definitions are in some way arbitrary. In the words of two seabird scientists "The one common characteristic that all seabirds share is that they feed in saltwater; but, as seems to be true with any statement in biology, some do not". <ref name = "Burger">Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7</ref> However by convention the penguins, tubenoses, all the Pelecaniformes except the darters, and some of the Charadriiformes (the skuas, gulls, terns, auks and skimmers) are all considered seabirds. The phalaropes are usually included as well, since although they are waders ("shorebirds" in North America), two of the three species are oceanic for nine months of the year, crossing the equator to feed pelagically.

Loons and grebes, which nest on lakes but winter at sea, are included by some authors, although they are usually treated as waterbirds. Although there are a number of sea ducks in the family Anatidae which are truly marine in the winter, by convention they are usually excluded from the seabird grouping. Many waders (or shorebirds) and herons are also highly marine, living on the sea's edge, but are also not treated as seabirds.

Evolution and fossil record of seabirds

Seabirds, by virtue of living in a geologically depositional environment (that is, in the sea where sediments are readily laid down) are well represented in the fossil record. They are first known to occur in the Cretaceous era, the earliest being the Hesperornithiformes, like Hesperornis regalis, a flightless loon-like seabird that dove in a similar fashion to loons and cormorants (using its feet to move underwater) but had a beak filled with sharp teeth. Image:Hesperornis.jpeg

While Hesperornis is not thought to have left descendants, the earliest extant seabirds also occurred in the Cretaceous, with a species called Tytthostonyx glauconiticus, which has been placed in the Procellariiformes. In the Paleogene the seas were dominated by early Procellariidae, giant penguins and two extinct families, the Pelagornithidae and the Plotopteridae (a group of large seabirds that looked like the penguins). Modern genera began their wide radiation in the Miocene although the genus Puffinus (which includes today's Manx Shearwater and Sooty Shearwater) dates back to the Oligocene.<ref name = "Burger">Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7</ref>

Characteristics of seabirds

Adaptations to life at sea

Seabirds have made numerous adaptations to living on and feeding in the sea. Wing morphology has been shaped by the niche an individual species or family has evolved, so that looking at a wing's shape and loading can tell a scientist about its life feeding behaviour. Longer wings and low wing loading are typical of more pelagic species, whilst diving species have shorter wings. Species such as the Wandering Albatross, which forage over huge areas of sea, have a reduced capacity for powered flight and are dependent on a type of gliding called dynamic soaring (where the wind deflected by waves provides lift) as well as slope soaring. Seabirds also almost always have webbed feet, both to aid movement on the surface as well as used for diving in some species. The Procellariiformes are also unusual amongst birds in having a strong sense of smell (olfaction) which is used to find widely distributed food in a vast ocean,<ref>Lequette, B., Verheyden, C., Jowentin, P. (1989) "Olfaction in Subantarctic seabirds: Its phylogenetic and ecological significance" The Condor 91: 732-135. [1]</ref> and possibly to locate their colonies.

Salt glands are used by seabirds to deal with the salt they ingest by drinking and feeding (particularly on crustaceans), and help them osmoregulate. The excretions from these glands (positioned in the head of the birds and emerging from the nasal cavity) are almost pure NaCl. Image:Phalacrocorax-auritus-007.jpg With the exception of the cormorants, all seabirds have waterprooof plumage in common with most other birds, however unlike terrestrial birds they have far more feathers protecting their bodies. This dense plumage is better able to protect the bird from getting wet, and cold is kept out by a dense layer of down feathers. The cormorants allow water to soak their feathers as it allows them to swim without fighting the buoyancy that retaining air in the feathers causes, the cost of this is the need to dry out the feathers one they return to land.

The plumage of most seabirds is less colourful than that of landbirds, mostly restricted to variations of black, white or grey. A few species sport colourful plumes (like the tropicbirds or some penguins), but the majority of colour in seabirds comes from the bills and legs. The plumage of seabirds is thought in many cases to be for camouflage, both defensive (the colour of US Navy battleships is the same as that of Antarctic Prions, in both cases it reduces visibility at sea), and aggressive (the white underside possessed by many seabirds helps hide them from prey below them).

Seabird feeding

Seabirds evolved to exploit different food resources on the world's seas and oceans, and to a great extent their physiology and behaviour have been shaped by their diet. These evolutionary forces have often caused species in different families and even orders to evolve similar strategies, and adaptations, to the same problems, leading to remarkable convergent evolution, such as that between auks and penguins. There are four basic feeding strategies, or ecological guilds, for at sea feeding, surface feeding, pursuit diving, plunge diving, and predation of higher vertebrates; within these guilds there are multiple variations on the theme.

Surface feeding

Many seabirds feed on the ocean's surface, as the action of marine currents often concentrates food such as krill, fish, squid or other prey items within reach of a dipped head. The distribution of prey on the sea's surface is often very patchy, some areas have large concentrations of food, while vast areas have none at all, so it is no coincidence that the species that exploit this resource are amongst the most efficient fliers of any of the seabirds, including the greatest long distance travelers of all, the albatrosses.

Image:Blackskimmer64.jpg Surface feeding itself can be broken up into two different approaches, surface feeding while flying (for example as practiced by gadfly petrels, frigate-birds and some storm-petrels) and surface feeding whilst swimming (examples of which are fulmars, gulls, many shearwaters and gadfly petrels). Surface feeders in flight include some of the most acrobatic of seabirds, either snatching morsels from the water (as do frigate-birds and some terns), or 'walking' on the water's surface, as do the storm-petrels. Many of these do not land in the water and all and have difficulty getting airborne again should they do so. Another seabird family that does not land while feeding is the skimmer, which has a unique fishing method; skimmers fly along the surface with the lower mandible in the water, this shuts automatically when the bill touches something in the water. The skimmer's bill reflects its unusual lifestyle, with the lower mandible uniquely being longer than the upper one.

Surface feeders that swim often have unique bills as well, adapted for their specific prey. Prions have special bills with filters called lamellae to filter out plankton from mouthfulls of water,<ref name = "Brooke">Brooke, M. (2004). Albatrosses And Petrels Across The World Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0-19-850125-0</ref> and many albatross and petrels have hooked bills to snatch fast moving prey. Gulls have more generalised bills that reflect their more opportunistic lifestyle.

Pursuit diving

Image:Penguinu.jpg Pursuit diving exerts greater pressures (both evolutionary and physiological) on seabirds, but the reward is a greater area to feed in than is available to surface feeders. Propulsion underwater can be provided by wings (as used by penguins, auks, diving petrels, and some petrels), or feet (as used by cormorants (as well as grebes and divers and several types of fish-eating ducks). Wing-propelled divers generally are faster than foot-propelled divers.<ref name = "Burger">Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7</ref> In both cases the use of wings or feet for diving has limited their utility in other situations: divers and grebes walk with extreme difficulty (if at all), penguins cannot fly, and auks have sacrificed flight efficiency to a great extent in favor of underwater diving. For example, the razorbill (an Atlantic auk) requires 64% more energy to fly than an equivalent-sized petrel.<ref name = "Auk">Gaston, Anthony J. & Jones, Ian L. (1998). The Auks Oxford:Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-854032-9</ref> Many shearwaters are intermediate between the two, having longer wings than typical wing-propelled divers but heavier wing loadings than the other surface-feeding procellariids, leaving them capable of diving to considerable depths while still being efficient long-distance travellers. The most impressive diving exibited by shearwaters is found in the Short-tailed Shearwater, which has been recorded diving below 70m.<ref>Weimerskirch, H., Cherel, Y., (1998) Feeding ecology of short-tailed shearwaters: breeding in Tasmania and foraging in the Antarctic? Marine Ecology Progress Series 167: 261-274</ref> Some albatross species are also capable of doing some limited diving, with Light-mantled Sooty Albatrosses holding the record at 12m.<ref>Prince, P.A., Huin, N., Weimerskirch, H., (1994) "Diving depths of albatrosses" Antarctic Science 6: (3) 353-354.</ref> Of all the wing-propelled pursuit divers, the most efficient in the air are the albatrosses, and it is no coincidence that they are the poorest divers. This is the dominant guild in polar and subpolar environments, as it is energetically inefficient in warmer waters. With their poor flying ability, many wing-propelled pursuit divers are more limited in their foraging range than other guilds, especially during the breeding season when hungry chicks need regular feeding.

Plunge-diving

Gannets, boobies, tropicbirds, some terns and Brown Pelicans all engage in plunge-diving, taking fast moving prey by diving from flight into the water. This uses less energy than dedicated pursuit divers, and they are able to use more spread out food resources, for example impoverished tropical seas. In general this is the most specialised method of hunting employed by seabirds, other non-specialists (such as gulls and skuas) may use it but do so with less skill and from lower heights. In Brown Pelicans the skills of plunge diving take several years to develop fully, once mature they can dive from 20 m above the water's surface, shifting the body before impact to avoid injury.<ref name ="elliot">Elliot, A. (1992) "Family Pelecanidae (Pelicans)" in Handbook of Birds of the World Vol 1. Barcelona:Lynx Edicions, ISBN 84-87334-10-5</ref> Plunge divers are restricted in their hunting grounds to clear waters that afford a view of their prey from the air, and are the dominant guild in the tropics. Some plunge divers (as well as surface feeders) are dependent on dolphins and tuna to push shoaling fish up towards the surface. <ref name = "AU">Au, D.W.K. & Pitman, R.L. (1986) Seabird interactions with Dolphins and Tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Condor, 88: 304-317. [2]</ref>

Kleptoparasitism, scavenging and other seabirds

Image:Skua and penguin.jpegThis catch-all category refers to other seabird strategies that involve the next trophic level up. Kleptoparasites are seabirds that make a living (or more often a part of their living) stealing food of other seabirds. Most famously frigate-birds and skuas engage in this behaviour, although gulls, terns and other species will steal food opportunistically. The nocturnal nesting behaviour of many seabirds has been interpreted as arising due to pressure from this arial piracy. Many species of gull will also feed on seabird and sea mammal carrion when the opportunity arises, as will giant petrels. Some species of albatross also engage in scavanging, an analysis of the regurgitated squid beaks has shown that many of the squid eaten are too large to have been caught alive, and include mid-water species likely to be beyond the reach of albatross. <ref>Croxall, J.P. & Prince, P.A. (1994). "Dead or alive, night or day: how do albatrosses catch squid?" Antarctic Science 6: 155–162.</ref> Some species will also feed on other seabirds, for example gulls, skuas and giant petrels will often take eggs, chicks and even small seabirds on nesting colonies.

Life-history

Seabirds' life-histories are dramatically different from those of land birds. In general they are K-selected, live much longer (anywhere between 20 and 60 years), they delay breeding for longer (for up to 10 years), and invest more effort into fewer young.<ref name = "Burger">Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7</ref> Many species will only have one clutch a year, unless they lose the first (with a few exceptions, like the Cassin's Auklet), and many species (like the tubenoses and sulids), only one egg a year.

There is also a long period of care for the young, extending for as long as six months, among the longest for birds. For example, once Common Guillemot chicks fledge they remain with the male parent for several months at sea. This life-history strategy has probably evolved both in response to the challenges of living at sea and the relative lack of predation compared to that of land living birds.

Because of the greater investment in raising the young and because foraging for food may occur far from the nest site, in most species both parents participate in caring for the young and pairs are typically at least seasonally monogamous.

Seabird colonies

See also Seabird colony

Image:Murre colony.jpg 95% of seabirds are colonial,<ref name = "Burger">Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7</ref> and seabird colonies are amongst the largest in the world, and provide one of Earth's great wildlife spectacles. Colonies of over a million birds have been recorded, both in the tropics (such as Kiritimati in the Pacific) and in the polar latitudes (as found in Antarctica). Seabird colonies occur exclusively for the purpose of breeding, non-breeding birds will only collect together outside the breeding season in areas where prey species are densely aggregated.

Seabird colonies are highly variable. Individual nesting sites can be widely spaced, as in an albatross colony, or densely packed like a murre colony. In most seabird colonies several different species will nest on the same colony, often exhibiting some niche separation. Seabirds can nest in trees (if any are available), on the ground (with or without nests), on cliffs, in burrows under the ground and in rocky crevices.

Many seabirds show remarkable site fidelity, returning to the same burrow, nest or site for many years, and they will defend that site from rivals with great vigour. This increases breeding success, provides an place for returning mates to reunite, and reduces the costs of prospecting for a new site. Young adults breeding for the first time usually return to their natal colony, and often nest very close to where they hatched.

Colonies are thought to provide protection to seabirds, which are often very clumsy on land, and are usually situated on islands where land mammals have difficulty getting to. Coloniality often arises in other types of bird which do not defend feeding territories (such as swifts, which have a very variable prey source), this may be a reason why it arises more frequently in seabirds. There are other possible advantages, colonies may act as information centres, where seabirds returning to the sea to forage can find out where prey is by studying returning individuals of the same species There are disadvantages to colonial life, particularly the spread of disease. Colonies also attract the attention of predators, principally avian predators, and many species attend their colonies nocturnally to avoid predation. <ref>Keitt, B.S., Tershy, B.R. & Croll, D.A (2004). "Nocturnal behavior reduces predation pressure on Black-vented Shearwaters Puffinus opisthomelas" Marine Ornithology 32 (3): 173-178.[3]</ref>

Seabird migration

Image:Smallarctern.jpgLike many birds, seabirds often migrate after the breeding season. Of these, the trip taken by the Arctic Tern is the farthest of any bird, crossing the equator in order to spend the Austral summer of Antarctica. Other species also undertake trans-equatorial trips, both from the north to the south, like Elegant Terns, which nest off Baja California and feed off Peru in the Humboldt Current, or the two species of marine phalaropes, the Grey Phalarope and the Red-necked Phalarope; to those that undertake south to north, like the Sooty Shearwaters that nest in New Zealand and Chile and spend the northern summer feeding in the North Pacific.

Other species also migrate shorter distances away from the breeding sites, their distribution at sea determined by the availability of food. After fledging, juvenile birds often disperse further than adults to, and to different areas, and are commonly sighted far from a species' normal range. Some species, such as the auks, do not have a concerted migration effort, but drift southwards as the winter approaches. Other species, such as some of the storm-petrels, diving petrels and cormorants, never disperse at all, staying near the breeding colonies year round.

Away from the sea

Whilst the definition of seabirds suggests that the birds in question spend their lives on the ocean, many seabird families have many species that spend some or even most of their lives inland away from the sea. Most strikingly, many species breed many tens, hundreds or even thousands of miles inland. Some of these species still return to the ocean to feed, for example the Snow Petrel, the nests of which have been found 300 miles inland on the Antarctic mainland, are unlikely to find anything to eat around their breeding sites. The Marbled Murrelet nests inland in old-growth forest, seeking ancient conifers with large branches to nest on. Other species, such as the California Gull, nest and feed inland on lakes, and then move to the coasts in the winter. Some cormorant, pelican, gull and tern species have individuals that never visit the sea at all, spending their lives on lakes, rivers, swamps and, in the case of some gulls, cities and agricultural land. In these cases it is thought that these terrestrial or freshwater birds evolved from marine ancestors.<ref name = "Gaston">Gaston, Anthony J. (2004). Seabirds: A Natural History New Haven:Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-10406-5</ref> Some seabirds, principally those that nest in tundra like skuas and phalaropes, will migrate across land as well.

The more marine species, such as petrels, auks, and gannets, are more restricted in their habits, but are occasionally seen inland as vagrants. This most commonly happens to young inexperienced birds, but can happen in large numbers to exhausted adults after a large storm, an event known as a wreck, where they are prized sightings for birders.

Seabirds and humans

Seabirds and fisheries

Seabirds have had a long association with both fisheries and sailors. Both fisheries and seabirds have drawn benefits and disadvantages from the long relationship.

Fishermen have long used seabirds as indicators of both fish shoals, <ref name = "AU">Au, D.W.K. & Pitman, R.L. (1986) Seabird interactions with Dolphins and Tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Condor, 88: 304-317. [4]</ref> underwater banks that might indicate fish stocks, and of potential land. In fact the known association of seabirds with land was instrumental in allowing the Polynesians to locate tiny landmasses in the Pacific.<ref name = "Burger">Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7</ref> Seabirds also provided food for fishermen away from home, as well as bait. Famously tethered cormorants have been used to catch fish directly. Indirectly fisheries have also benefited from guano from colonies of seabirds acting as fertilizer for the surrounding seas.

Negative effects on fisheries are mostly restricted to raiding by birds on aquaculture, although longlining fisheries also have to deal with bait-stealing. There have been claims of prey-depletion by seabirds of fishery stocks, and while there is some small evidence of this, the effects of seabirds are considered smaller than that of marine mammals and predatory fish (like tuna).

Image:Seabirds longlinersm.jpg.jpegSome species and families of seabirds have benefited from fisheries, particularly from discarded fish and offal. These discards comprise 30% of the food of seabirds in the North Sea, for example, and comprise up to 70% of the total food of some species. This can have other impacts, for example the spread of the Northern Fulmar through the British Isles is attributed in part to the availability of discards.<ref>Thompson, P.M., (2004) "Identifying drivers of change; did fisheries play a role in the spread of North Atlantic fulmars?" in Management of marine ecosystems: monitoring change in upper trophic levels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [5] </ref> Discards generally benefit surface feeders, such as gannets and petrels to the detriment of pursuit divers like penguins.

Fisheries also have negative effects on seabirds, and these effects, particularly on the long lived and slow breeding albatross are a source of increasing concern to conservationists. The by-catch of seabirds entangled in nets or hooked on fishing lines has had a big impact on seabird numbers, for example an estimated 100,000 albatross are hooked and drown each year on tuna lines set out by long-line fisheries.<ref>BirdLife International/RSPB (2005) Save the Albatross: The Problem Retrieved March 17, 2006</ref> <ref>Brothers NP. 1991. "Albatross mortality and associated bait loss in the Japanese longline fishery in the southern ocean." Biological Conservation 55: 255-268.</ref> Overall many hundreds of thousands or possibly millions of birds are trapped and killed each year, a source of concern for some of the rarest species (for example, only 1,000 Short-tailed Albatross are known to still exist). Seabirds also suffer when stocks of fish are overfished.

Exploitation of seabirds

The hunting of seabirds, and the collecting of seabird eggs, have contributed to the declines of many species of seabirds, as well as the extinction of one species, the Great Auk. Seabirds have been hunted for food by many coastal people over time, and have become locally extinct in many places. In particular at least 20 species out of 29 no longer breed on Easter Island. In the 19th century the hunting of seabirds for fat deposits and feathers for the millinery trade reached industrial levels. In the Falkland Islands hundreds of thousands of penguins were harvested for their oil each year. Seabird eggs have also long been an important source of food for sailors undertaking long sea voyages, as well as being taken when cities grow in areas near a colony. Eggers from San Francisco took almost half a millions eggs a year from the Farallon Islands in the mid 19th century, a period in the island's history from which the seabird species are still recovering.<ref>White, Peter; (1995), The Farallon Islands, Sentinels of the Golden Gate, Scottwall Associates:San Francisco, ISBN 0-942087-10-0</ref>

Both hunting and egging continue today, although not at the level that occurred in the past, and generally in a more controlled level. For example, the Māori of Stewart Island/Rakiura continue to harvest the chicks of the Sooty Shearwater as they have done so for centuries, using traditional methods (called kaitiakitanga) to manage the harvest, but now also work with the University of Otago in studying the populations. In Greenland, however, uncontrolled hunting is pushing many species into steep decline.<ref>Burnham, W., Burnham, K.K., Cade, T.J., (2005) "Past and present assessments of bird life in Uummannaq District, West Greenland" Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 99: 196-208 [6]</ref>

Other threats

Other human factors have led to declines and even extinctions in seabird populations, colonies and species. Of these, perhaps the most serious are introduced species. Seabirds, breeding overall on small isolated islands, have lost many predator defense behaviour. <ref>Moors, P.J.; Atkinson, I.A.E. (1984). Predation on seabirds by introduced animals, and factors affecting its severity.. In Status and Conservation of the World's Seabirds. Cambridge: ICBP. ISBN 0-946888-03-5.</ref> Feral cats are capable of taking out seabirds as large as albatross, and many introduced rodents, such as the Pacific rat can take eggs hidden in burrows. Introduced goats, cattle, rabbits and other herbivores can also lead to problems, particularly when species need vegetation to protect or shade their young. Disturbance of breeding colonies by people is often a problem as well, visitors, even well meaning tourists, can flush a colony leaving chicks and eggs vulnerable to predators.

Image:Oiledcrestedauklet.jpeg The build up of toxins and pollutants in seabirds is also a concern. Seabirds, being apex predators, suffered from the ravages of DDT until they were banned, and concern continues with other pollutants, for example Forster's Terns in San Francisco were found to have high levels of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), used as fire retardants. Oil spills are also a major threat to seabird species, as both a toxin and because the feathers of the birds become saturated by the oil, causing them to lose their waterproofing.

Seabird conservation

The threats faced by seabirds have not gone unnoticed by scientists or the conservation movement. As early as 1903 Theodore Roosevelt was convinced of the need to declare Pelican Island in Florida a National Wildlife Refuge to protect the bird colonies (including the nesting Brown Pelicans), a few years later in 1909 he protected the Farallon Islands. Today many important seabird colonies are given some measure of protection, from Heron Island in Australia to Triangle Island in British Columbia.

The field of island restoration, developed initially by New Zealand, is removing exotic invaders from increasingly large islands. Feral cats have been removed from Ascension Island, Arctic Foxes from many islands in the Aleutians, <ref>Williams, J.C., Byrd G.V.& Konyukhov, N.B. (2003) Whiskered Auklets Aethia pygmaea, foxes, humans and how to right a wrong. 'Marine Ornithology 31: 175-180 [7]</ref> and rats from Campbell Island. The removal of these introduced species has led to increases in surviving species and even the return of expirated ones. After the removal of cats from Ascension Island seabirds began to nest there again for the first time in over a hundred years.

Seabird mortality caused by long-line fisheries can be massively reduced by techniques such as setting long-line bait at night, dying the bait blue, setting the bait underwater, increasing the amount of weight on lines and using bird scarers can all reduce the seabird by-catch,<ref>Food and Agriculture Organisation (1999) "The incidental catch of seabirds by longline fisheries: worldwide review and technical guidelines for mitigation. FAO Fisheries Circular No.937. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [8]</ref> and their deployment is increasingly required by many national fishing fleets. The international ban on the use of drift nets has also helped reduce the mortality of seabirds and other marine wildlife.

One of the Millennium Projects in the UK was the Scottish Seabird Centre, near the important bird sanctuaries on Bass Rock, Fidra and other surrounding islands. The area is home to huge colonies of gannets, puffins, skuas and other seabirds. The centre allows visitors to watch live video from the islands as well as learn about the threats the birds face and how we can protect them, and has helped to significantly raise the profile of seabird conservation in the UK.

The plight of albatross and other large seabirds, as well as other marine creatures, being taken as by-catch by longline fisheries, has been taken up by a large number of NGOs (including BirdLife International and the RSPB). This lead to Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels signed as part of the Convention on Migratory Species, a legally binding treaty designed to protect these threatened species (it has currently been ratified by eight countries, Argentina, Australia, Ecuador, New Zealand, Spain, France, Peru and South Africa.

Seabirds in culture

Image:Pelican-in-her-piety.jpgMany seabirds, living far out to sea and breeding in isolated colonies, have been and still are very obscure and unknown, even to scientists. Some seabirds have made the break into popular consciousness, most particularly the albatross and gulls. Pelicans have long been associated with mercy and altruism because of an early Western Christian myth that they split open their breast to feed their starving chicks. The albatross have been described as the most legendary of birds, and have a variety of myths and legends associated with them, and today it is widely considered unlucky to harm them, although the notion that sailors believed that is a myth.<ref name = "Brit">Cocker, M., & Mabey, R., (2005) Birds Britannica London:Chatto & Windus, ISBN 0-701-16907-9</ref> This myth derives from Samuel Taylor Coleridge's famous poem, the Rime of the Ancient Mariner, where a sailor is punished for harming an albatross by wearing the dead bird around his neck. It was, however, considered unlucky to touch a storm-petrels, especially one that has landed on the ship.

Gulls are one of the most commonly seen seabirds, given their use of human made habitats (such as cities and dumps), and their often fearless nature. They therefore also have made it into the popular consciousness, if only as the 'flying rats' berated in Finding Nemo. They have been used metaphorically, as in Jonathan Livingston Seagull, by Richard Bach, or to denote a closeness to the sea, such as their use in the Lord of the Rings, both in the insignia of Gondor, and therefore Númenor (used in the design of the film), and to call Legolas to, and across, the sea.

Seabird families

The following are the groups of birds normally classed as seabirds.

Sphenisciformes (Antarctic and southern waters; 16 species)

Procellariiformes (Tubenoses: pan-oceanic and pelagic; 93 species)

(see also petrel)

Pelecaniformes (Worldwide; 57 species)

Charadriiformes (Worldwide; 305 species, but only the families listed are classed as seabirds.)

For an alternative taxonomy of these groups, see also Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy.

See also list of birds.

References

  • del Hoyo, Josep, Elliott, Andrew & Sargatal, Jordi (1992). Handbook of Birds of the World Vol 1. Barcelona:Lynx Edicions, ISBN 84-87334-10-5
  • Gaston, Anthony J. & Jones, Ian L. (1998). The Auks Oxford:Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-854032-9
  • Gaston, Anthony J. (2004). Seabirds: A Natural History New Haven:Yale University Press, ISBN 0-300-10406-5
  • Löfgren, Lars (1984). Ocean Birds, Gothenburg:Nordbok, ISBN 0-394-53101-9
  • Schreiber, Elizabeth A. & Burger, Joanne.(2001.) Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7

Notes and references

<references/>

External links

fr:Oiseau de mer io:Mar-ucelo ja:海鳥 no:Sjøfugl